2020
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Complex Causes of Kidney Allograft Loss

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough graft loss is a primary endpoint in many studies in kidney transplantation and a broad spectrum of risk factors has been identified, the eventual causes of graft failure in individual cases remain ill studied. MethodsWe performed a single-center cohort study in 1000 renal allograft recipients, transplanted between March 2004 and February 2013. ResultsIn total, 365 (36.5%) graft losses were identified, of which 211 (57.8%) were due to recipient death with a functioning graft and 154 (42.2%) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Death-censored graft failure, as return to dialysis or re-transplantation, is seen in 10–12.5% of kidney transplant recipients at 5–6.2 years after transplantation [ 5 , 6 ]. Overall graft failure, including death with a functioning graft, is seen at a rate of 5% each year of follow-up, of which 40–60% is attributed to death with a functioning graft [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Graft function decline, as doubling of serum creatinine or graft failure, is seen in 18.8% of kidney transplant recipients at 5.4 years after transplantation [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Death-censored graft failure, as return to dialysis or re-transplantation, is seen in 10–12.5% of kidney transplant recipients at 5–6.2 years after transplantation [ 5 , 6 ]. Overall graft failure, including death with a functioning graft, is seen at a rate of 5% each year of follow-up, of which 40–60% is attributed to death with a functioning graft [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Graft function decline, as doubling of serum creatinine or graft failure, is seen in 18.8% of kidney transplant recipients at 5.4 years after transplantation [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IP-IMS/RHP-PE maintenance was administered using TAC + MPS + PRED. PRED was administered throughout maintenance at doses of 0.5 mg/kg with maximum dose of 30 mg/day (Van Loon et al, 2020;Wekerle et al, 2017).…”
Section: Immunosuppressive Protocol At the Rhp/pe (Ip-ims/rhp-pe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite improved graft and patient survival in the first year after KT due to more appropriate clinical control and diagnosis, together with improved treatment of bacterial and viral infections, and rejection, each subsequent year increases the risk of the recipient returning to KRT or evolving to death even with a functioning graft. Long-term CKD-T survival may involve processes linked to malignancy, infections related to immunosuppression, infarction and stroke (Van Loon et al, 2020). The analysis of survival rates and the components of mortality-associated covariates are crucial in the planning and evaluation of CKD-T care (Djamali et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main challenge is how to improve long-term outcomes [3,4]. The introduction of potent and selective agents for the initiation of immunosuppression, as induction therapy, has reduced the incidence of acute rejection early post transplantation and improved 1-year graft survival [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, long-term graft survival was less linked to induction therapy and more to maintenance immunosuppressive regimen and existence of medical comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%