“…Jordan illustrates the foreign-aid mechanism+ King Abdullah II, who ascended in 1999, "has actively pursued stronger alliances and aid ties with the United States, Britain, and the European Union as well as international financial institutions such 59+ See Hyde 2008;and Kelley 2008+ as the IMF and the World Bank+" 60 Jordan's continued economic development hinges on privatization, foreign investment, and, especially, Western aid+ For example, since 1964, Jordan's central government annual current expenditures have closely tracked external aid receipts+ 61 Over the same time period, foreign aid as a percentage of Jordanian central government budget expenditures hovered at around 25 percent~and never below 10 percent!+ Jordan's ties with the West strengthened after 11 September 2001, when Jordan became a key supporter of the U+S+ "war on terror+" In this context, Abdullah sought to improve the status of women in society and thereby burnish Jordan's image abroad+ One way to accomplish this was by setting aside six of the 110 seats in parliament for women in 2003+ 62 The quota resulted in six female MPs but also some opposition+ In the past, Jordanian women had campaigned unsuccessfully for a quota+ 63 When Abdullah endorsed the quota by royal decree, however, he angered both the Higher Committee for the Coordination of National Opposition Parties, which issued a statement rejecting it, and also some female activists, who found that the quota discriminated against the urban areas where they lived+ 64 It is worth underscoring how this theory differs from previous research on the impact of norms in world politics+ 65 Constructivist approaches argue that norm entrepreneurs socialize global audiences to new principled ideas that then become accepted and institutionalized+ The mechanisms are first, persuasion, and then, socialization, institutionalization, and demonstration+ 66 For example, in a study of the influence of norms on state behavior, Finnemore found that the social structure of the state system caused a convergence across all states in the creation of science bureaucracies, the acceptance of new rules of war, and the definition of development+ 67 This article develops a theory, however, of how norms affect states differentially due to international inequalities+ In the case of the spread of gender quotas, reserved seats for women proliferate in developing countries even as they remain off the table in many developed countries+ Indeed, actors in the democracy establishment do not use the informational techniques of transnational activists, such as symbolism, leverage, and accountability tactics+ 68 Instead, their ideas wield influence because they enjoy a privileged position in postconflict countries via peace operations and because of their perceived linkages to foreign aid, foreign investment, and international and domestic legitimacy+ …”