Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
As the earliest discussed concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), Landscape-scale GI, in the form of an ecological network capable of balancing development and conservation, has received widespread attention. Its multifunctionality is one of the important features. However, the lack of information and funding, weakness of management authority and technical support make the practice of Landscape-scale GI challenging. Compared to GI adapted in stormwater management, which has comprehensive guidance from theory to practical technologies by officials during its introduction and promotion in other countries, Landscape-scale GI, despite a rich theoretical research foundation, is often overlooked due to insufficient summary research on practical techniques. To address this gap, this study uses mixed methods research to comprehensively analyze 27 Landscape-scale GI practical projects led by the Conservation Fund over the past 20 years to explore patterns in their technical applications. Through qualitative analysis, we standardized and classified descriptive information for these 27 projects and, combined with statistical analysis, clarified the practice development trends committed to balancing development and conservation. The quantitative analysis concentrated on the corresponding relationships between technical applications and project objectives, and GI functions. Based on this, the study categorized the technologies used, summarizing core technologies applicable to most Landscape-scale GI practices, providing some support for the promotion of Landscape-scale GI.
As the earliest discussed concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), Landscape-scale GI, in the form of an ecological network capable of balancing development and conservation, has received widespread attention. Its multifunctionality is one of the important features. However, the lack of information and funding, weakness of management authority and technical support make the practice of Landscape-scale GI challenging. Compared to GI adapted in stormwater management, which has comprehensive guidance from theory to practical technologies by officials during its introduction and promotion in other countries, Landscape-scale GI, despite a rich theoretical research foundation, is often overlooked due to insufficient summary research on practical techniques. To address this gap, this study uses mixed methods research to comprehensively analyze 27 Landscape-scale GI practical projects led by the Conservation Fund over the past 20 years to explore patterns in their technical applications. Through qualitative analysis, we standardized and classified descriptive information for these 27 projects and, combined with statistical analysis, clarified the practice development trends committed to balancing development and conservation. The quantitative analysis concentrated on the corresponding relationships between technical applications and project objectives, and GI functions. Based on this, the study categorized the technologies used, summarizing core technologies applicable to most Landscape-scale GI practices, providing some support for the promotion of Landscape-scale GI.
Urbanization intensifies the need for sustainable public transportation that balances financial viability, environmental sustainability, and social equity. Traditional fare-setting methods often focus narrowly on financial objectives, neglecting broader impacts. This study introduces a novel collaborative game-theoretic model integrating user sentiment analysis to optimize fare policies. By incorporating utilities of passengers, operators, and governments, and employing the Shapley value for fair benefit distribution, this model aims to maximize social welfare. The methodology frames fare optimization as a cooperative game among stakeholders, integrating passenger preferences through sentiment analysis. The social welfare function combines the utilities of all stakeholders and is maximized under operational, environmental, and financial constraints. Implemented in Python and applied to Isparta, Turkey, the model identifies an optimal fare of 19.5 TL (ranged between 14 and 26.50 TL) that maximizes social welfare, aligning closely with existing fares. Shapley value analysis distributes the benefits, assigning 221,457 (35.6%) units to passengers, 54,562 (8.7%) units to operators, and 347,433 (55.7%) units to the government, highlighting significant environmental gains for the government. Sensitivity analyses confirm the model’s robustness across varying trip volumes, suggesting its applicability to diverse urban settings. This research contributes to socially equitable and user-centric fare policies by providing a comprehensive framework aligning stakeholder interests. Policymakers can leverage this model to design fare strategies promoting sustainability, efficiency, and collaboration in public transportation systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.