1996
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620151201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the ecological risk of metals in sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on extensive research, however, it is widely accepted that risk assessments of sediment associated metals should be based on the bioavailable fraction of these metals (Ankley et al, 1996). In this study, changes in land use were simulated under controlled conditions to describe spatial and temporal variation in redox conditions and metal bioavailability and relate these changes to uptake and effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on extensive research, however, it is widely accepted that risk assessments of sediment associated metals should be based on the bioavailable fraction of these metals (Ankley et al, 1996). In this study, changes in land use were simulated under controlled conditions to describe spatial and temporal variation in redox conditions and metal bioavailability and relate these changes to uptake and effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AVSmetals hypothesis uses the relative concentrations of two operationally defined classes of components, acid-volatile sulfides and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM), to predict whether metals in sediments may be biologically available. A decade of research has defined and tested this hypothesis (see references in [1]). Acid-volatile sulfides consist of a class of metal sulfides that react with aqueous acids at room temperature to liberate gaseous hydrogen sulfide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When applied to metals, the approach incorporates the hypothesis that acid-volatile sulfides (AVS) limit the activity and therefore the bioavailability of metals in many sediments [1]. The AVSmetals hypothesis uses the relative concentrations of two operationally defined classes of components, acid-volatile sulfides and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM), to predict whether metals in sediments may be biologically available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analysis alone is insufficient for the assessment of sediment toxicity. It is impossible to determine every anthropogenic contaminant and, furthermore, the effects of most contaminants on the aquatic organisms are still unknown (Ankley et al, 1996). For this reason, the combination of chemical analysis with biological tests becomes important (Fernández et al, 1992;Brack et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%