2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effect of sample orientation on dimensional X-ray computed tomography through experimental and simulated data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…algorithms for edge detection and material boundary/surface determination [21][22][23][24][25]. Thereafter, the geometric characteristics of those surfaces can be used as a reference for dimensional metrology.…”
Section: Dimensional Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…algorithms for edge detection and material boundary/surface determination [21][22][23][24][25]. Thereafter, the geometric characteristics of those surfaces can be used as a reference for dimensional metrology.…”
Section: Dimensional Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose to overcome this by simply inspecting the features of an object and then calculating the projection angles required to reconstruct them; no exhaustive XCT simulation is required, nor an optimisation algorithm. The aim of our method is to improve the quality of object surfaces, such that a surface model of an object can be extracted from a CT data set for subsequent analysis [14,15]. Our approach is inspired by that of Zheng et al [11] and Qunito et al [13] who noted that the surface of an object can only be reliably reconstructed if a ray-path is tangent to the surface; this was also recently exploited by Butzhammer et al [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it influences the downstream setup parameters, like the X-ray tube and the detector settings. Moreover, the workpiece orientation has a decisive influence on various CT artefacts such as beam hardening and cone beam artefacts [3,4], which in turn effect image and measurement quality. Especially for multimaterial components made from highdensity materials bedded in low-density materials, such CT artefacts are particularly pronounced and can even prevent a reliable measurement [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to understand the correlation between workpiece orientation, as well as image and measurement quality, and to devise methods that help to select optimum angles for orientation. The majority of previous publications in this field assume that orientation can be optimised on the basis of workpiece transmission length [3][4][5][6][7][8] and / or workpiece surface area perpendicular to the rotation axis [3,5,6,9]. These strategies aim to reduce beam hardening and cone beam artefacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation