Assessing the Effectiveness of Infrastructure Public—Private Partnership Programs and Projects

Garvin, Michael J.; Bosso, Doran Joseph

doi:10.1177/1087724x08323845

Cited by 105 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…more or less coordinated collections of PPP projects undertaken in a given politically sovereign area. Research that looks at this collective level has been much more limited (Clark and Root, 1999;Kumaraswamy and Zhang, 2001;Greenaway et al, 2004;Flinders, 2005;Aziz, 2007;UNECE, 2007;Garvin and Bosso, 2008). We agree with Rachwalski and Ross (2010) that more work is needed that looks at how governments might best organize their PPP programmes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 71%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Beyond ‘one size fits all’: how local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development

Jooste¹,

Levitt²,

Scott³

2011

Engineering Project Organization Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) for infrastructure development has received significant scholarly attention of late, but there remains a need for more work at the programme level. Specifically, there is a need for work that recognizes the way that PPP programmes are implemented differently in different regions, thereby progressing beyond an effectively 'one size fits all' view of PPP programmes. In response, this paper offers a comparative analysis of the historical development trajectories of three contemporary PPP programmes: in British Columbia (BC) (Canada), Victoria (Australia) and South Africa. We begin by recognizing the role played by the UK's private finance initiative as a programme model, and then show how this model was adapted and modified in each of our cases, leading to very different field structures. The study uses a grounded theory building approach and draws heavily on theories of institutional change and structuration. There are two main contributions from this study: (1) we draw attention to the need for a context-specific approach to explain and predict PPP field development and (2) we develop arguments relating to institutional systems and processes that can guide future studies of these and similar fields.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…In fact, some have traced back this practice to previous centuries (see, for example, Garvin, 2007) and even ancient times (Ghobadian et al, 2004). The last three decades have, however, seen a striking resurgence of this approach, leading to widespread and deep reforms in the way that public services are delivered globally.…”

Section: Overarching Reform Trendsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Beyond ‘one size fits all’: how local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development

Jooste¹,

Levitt²,

Scott³

2011

Engineering Project Organization Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accordingly, the best matching schemes in Case 2 and Case 3 fully play to their advantages, because their match-degree in Case 2 and Case 3 become more volatile compared with the others, respectively. However, as shown in Figure 6, taking all matching schemes for the subject A 1 in the government, for instance, the average match-degree of the subjects in the government is superior to the average match-degree of the subjects in the enterprise [15,42,43]. Figure 7 depicts criterion weights on both parties involved.…”

Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Criterion Two-Sided Matching of Public–Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Criteria and Methods

Liang

Sheng

et al. 2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two kinds of evaluative criteria are associated with Public-Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects, i.e., private evaluative criteria and public evaluative criteria. These evaluative criteria are inversely related, that is, the higher the public benefits; the lower the private surplus. To balance evaluative criteria in the Two-Sided Matching (TSM) decision, this paper develops a quantitative matching decision model to select an optimal matching scheme for PPP infrastructure projects based on the Hesitant Fuzzy Set (HFS) under unknown evaluative criterion weights. In the model, HFS is introduced to describe values of the evaluative criteria and multi-criterion information is fully considered given by groups. The optimal model is built and solved by maximizing the whole deviation of each criterion so that the evaluative criterion weights are determined objectively. Then, the match-degree of the two sides is calculated and a multi-objective optimization model is introduced to select an optimal matching scheme via a min-max approach. The results provide new insights and implications of the influence on evaluative criteria in the TSM decision.

show abstract

“…Sentrale bidrag har for eksempel sett på bakgrunnen for slike initiativer (Linder 1999;Wettenhall 2003), mulighetene for at slike initiativer kan oppstå (Stiglitz & Wallsten 1999;Dunn 1999, Auerswald et al 2007), hvordan man kan måle om de har vaert vellykkede (Hodge & Greve 2007;Garvin & Bosso 2008) og hvordan ansvar og autoritet delegeres innenfor slike modeller (Pongsiri, 2002;Schaferhoff Campe & Kaan 2009). Et knippe studier har også sett spesifikt på multistakeholdertilnaermingen i cybersikkerhet.…”

Section: Sikkerhet I Cyberspaceunclassified

Makt og avmakt i cyberspace: hvordan styre det digitale rom?

Muller

2016

Internasjonal Politikk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Et sikkert cyberspace er nødvendig for en fungerende samfunnsstruktur, økonomisk, politisk og sosialt. Med samfunnets økende avhengighet av cyberspace for å kunne fungere normalt, har sikringen av cyberspace blitt stadig viktigere. For å løse sikkerhetsutfordringene knyttet til utviklingen av cyberspace har stater søkt støtte fra private aktører gjennom såkalte multistakeholder-initiativer. Med slike initiativer mener man en åpen form for samarbeid mellom interessenter, basert på en idé om likeverdige partnere. Stater iverksetter slike initiativer ut fra en tanke om at et samarbeid mellom private og offentlige aktører gir den beste formen for styring og sikring av aktiviteter i cyberspace. Implementeringen foregår imidlertid uten at de nødvendige forutsetningene for at en slik styringsform skal fungere er til stede. Selv om mange i dagens akademiske debatt stiller spørsmål ved om disse initiativene fungerer, er det få som har stilt spørsmål ved hvordan cybersikkerhet kan utøves i praksis. Dette fører til at man overser det sentrale spørsmålet om hvordan maktdynamikken mellom offentlig og privat sektor fungerer med henblikk på sikkerhet i cyberspace. Denne artikkelen diskuterer hvorvidt multistakeholder-initiativene faktisk fungerer som en kontrollog styringsmekanisme i cyberspace. Ved å se naermere på offentlig-privat samarbeid om cybersikkerhet i Norge er hensikten å gi en bedre forståelse av årsakene til at multistakeholder-initiativer ofte ikke fungerer i praksis.

show abstract

Assessing the Effectiveness of Infrastructure Public—Private Partnership Programs and Projects

Cited by 105 publications

References 5 publications

Beyond ‘one size fits all’: how local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development

Beyond ‘one size fits all’: how local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development

Multi-Criterion Two-Sided Matching of Public–Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Criteria and Methods

Makt og avmakt i cyberspace: hvordan styre det digitale rom?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About