2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effectiveness of real-world network simplification

Abstract: Many real-world networks are large, complex and thus hard to understand, analyze or visualize. Data about networks are not always complete, their structure may be hidden, or they may change quickly over time. Therefore, understanding how an incomplete system differs from a complete one is crucial. In this paper, we study the changes in networks submitted to simplification processes (i.e., reduction in size). We simplify 30 real-world networks using six simplification methods and analyze the similarity between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group quantifies how well structural properties of the original graph are preserved [46,61,72]. Popular metrics are the Degree Distribution (DD) and Clustering Coefficient Distribution (CCD) [7,45].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Graph Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group quantifies how well structural properties of the original graph are preserved [46,61,72]. Popular metrics are the Degree Distribution (DD) and Clustering Coefficient Distribution (CCD) [7,45].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Graph Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that RND improves the performance of the basic random node selection [7,35], where the nodes are selected to the sample uniformly at random. RND fits better spectral network properties [7] and produces the sample with larger weakly connected component [35]. Moreover, it shows good performance in preserving the clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality distribution of the original networks [35].…”
Section: Random Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RND fits better spectral network properties [7] and produces the sample with larger weakly connected component [35]. Moreover, it shows good performance in preserving the clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality distribution of the original networks [35]. Nevertheless, it can still construct a disconnected sample network, despite a fully connected original network.…”
Section: Random Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, although traditionally an edge contains only information about its presence, edge weighting should be essential for efficient and effective use of GDBs. Edge weighting is also useful to visualize interpersonal communication using network graphs in order to highlight the characteristics of the relationships (Blagus et al 2014). Edges formed from the observation in interpersonal communication could reflect more varied information like temporal characteristics of interpersonal communication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%