2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-020-00210-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Effectiveness of Student Advice Recommender Agent (SARA): the Case of Automated Personalized Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Living Letters An online ITS, which offers personalized instruction, hints, and corrections to focus students on solving target problems Kegel and Bus ( 2012 ) 8. SARA An ITS which can provide automated and personalized feedback to students Mousavi et al ( 2021 ) 9. FB-TS An ITS developed based on Fuzzy logic and Bayesian network, which can provide adaptive support to students Eryilmaz and Adabashi ( 2020 ) 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Living Letters An online ITS, which offers personalized instruction, hints, and corrections to focus students on solving target problems Kegel and Bus ( 2012 ) 8. SARA An ITS which can provide automated and personalized feedback to students Mousavi et al ( 2021 ) 9. FB-TS An ITS developed based on Fuzzy logic and Bayesian network, which can provide adaptive support to students Eryilmaz and Adabashi ( 2020 ) 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, natural experiment (5%), longitudinal study (10%), and Randomized Alternative-Treatment Design (2.5%) were rarely used. Finally, only 13.5% of the studies (n = 6) used the matching technique to formulate comparable control groups (Cung et al, 2019 ; Hickey et al, 2020 ; Mousavi et al, 2021 ; Pane et al ( 2014 ); Spichtig et al, 2019 ; Troussas et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, propensity score matching has been associated with shortcomings (King & Nielsen, 2019), while other matching procedures like nearest neighbour matching (using Mahanalobis Distance) and (coarsened) exact matching having been shown to avoid these shortcomings (King et al, 2011). Indeed, a comparison of matching methods in the context of assessing the efficacy of automated feedback showed that nearest neighbour matching using Mahanalobis Distance was the most suitable approach and outperformed the more common Propensity Score approach (Mousavi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Statistical Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aims to regroup and promote high-quality research in the field, creating a forum for challenges and novel advancements in AI in education to be explored. While a great deal of research has been presented in the field (Krouska et al, 2020 ; Anwar, 2021 ; Mousavi et al, 2021 ; Schaldenbrand et al, 2021 ; Sense et al, 2021 ; Pelánek, 2022 ; Rebolledo-Mendez et al, 2022 ; Zhou et al, 2022 ), there is a significant room for improvement in this direction. This Research Topic focuses on triggering an exchange of ideas in the field and reinforcing and expanding the network of researchers, academics, and market representatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%