2012
DOI: 10.1177/0954409712458496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effects of track input on the response of insulated rail joints using field experiments

Abstract: Manufacturers of insulated rail joints (IRJs) have to follow the quality assurance regime stipulated in the national design standards; unfortunately, IRJs still exhibit a very low and highly variable service life. It is widely believed that the service life of IRJs is affected by the track input under the passage of loaded wheels; however, there is a paucity of literature with regard to the actual mechanical behaviour of IRJs in the track. An extensive field test was, therefore, conducted on an inservice heavy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the velocity amplitudes generated by locomotive were found to be evidently greater than those from the rear wagons for all these three test sites. This phenomenon had been observed in most of the field tests [17,35], and the reason was mainly attributed to larger axle weight or the superimposed effect among axles. Based on the data from different train formations in this test, however, it was not the key for vibration differences.…”
Section: Train Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, the velocity amplitudes generated by locomotive were found to be evidently greater than those from the rear wagons for all these three test sites. This phenomenon had been observed in most of the field tests [17,35], and the reason was mainly attributed to larger axle weight or the superimposed effect among axles. Based on the data from different train formations in this test, however, it was not the key for vibration differences.…”
Section: Train Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…one-direction traffic) may influence the IRJ differentiating the dynamic behavior of the track before and after the discontinuity. As trains always run in the same direction on the track of this case study, only the rail after the discontinuity is subjected to impact forces, which may affect the track components such as the rail, the interaction between the rail and the connecting plates, and the condition of the support where the rail end is supported and the consecutive supports [14,16]. The symmetry of the dynamic behavior of IRJs with respect to the discontinuity is studied in "Symmetry of IRJs with respect to the discontinuity" section.…”
Section: Hammer Tests For the Irj Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With those results, a better understanding of the wheel-rail contact forces and track displacements was obtained. In [14], the main focus was on quantifying the differences between straight tracks and IRJs; whereas the differences between different IRJ types is presented in [15]. The degradation of IRJs has been investigated by extensive field monitoring combining visual analysis with either settlement measurements in [16] or geometry measurements in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the change in stiffness of rail pads and fatigue damage of the fastening system [1], the location of the rail weld between the adjacent sleepers [27], existence of track lateral irregularity [28], noise from braking pads, and damage appearance due to an increase in total train mass, etc.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysis On the Effectiveness Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%