2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the efficacy of Duddingtonia flagrans chlamydospores per gram of faeces to control Haemonchus contortus larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their suggestions were not confirmed in quantitative terms. However, the reduction in the number of spores due to digestion in the GIT seems to be an important factor in explaining the performance of D. flagrans when used in vivo [10,11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their suggestions were not confirmed in quantitative terms. However, the reduction in the number of spores due to digestion in the GIT seems to be an important factor in explaining the performance of D. flagrans when used in vivo [10,11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity of chlamydospores to bypass the ruminant digestion process has been based on in vitro observations using qualitative assessments of chlamydospore resistance (presence or absence of fungal specific features). However, currently it is possible to count the chlamydospores reaching the faeces [10,11]. Such chlamydospores can be considered as non-digested spores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, fecal samples of each animal were collected individually directly from the rectum before morning feeding on day 0 (pre-extract administration), and thereafter on days 1, 20, 40, and 60 after the first administration of the extract (on day 0). Fecal samples were evaluated for the presence of worm eggs or Eimeria oocysts by a salt flotation technique (MAFF 1979), and afterwards the parasite load was quantified using the McMaster method (Ojeda-Robertos et al 2008). Fecal pellets were collected, weighed, and 1 g of feces was mixed with 60 mL of a saturated salt (NaCl) solution.…”
Section: Parasitology Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, direct spraying might allow for the determination of the ideal amount of conidia to be used in each area based on regional epidemiological studies. Studies carried out by Ojeda-Robertos et al (2008a) suggest setting fungal dose based on the number of EPG, with a ratio of 5 chlamydospores per gram of faeces (CPG) per 10 EPG.…”
Section: Analysis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%