Assessing the efficiency of countries in making progress towards universal health coverage: a data envelopment analysis of 172 countries

Abstract

IntroductionMaximising efficiency of resources is critical to progressing towards universal health coverage (UHC) and the sustainable development goal (SDG) for health. This study estimates the technical efficiency of national health spending in progressing towards UHC, and the environmental factors associated with efficient UHC service provision.MethodsA two-stage efficiency analysis using Simar and Wilson’s double bootstrap data envelopment analysis investigates how efficiently countries convert health spending into UHC outputs (measured by service coverage and financial risk protection) for 172 countries. We use World Bank and WHO data from 2015. Thereafter, the environmental factors associated with efficient progress towards UHC goals are identified.ResultsThe mean bias-corrected technical efficiency score across 172 countries is 85.7% (68.9% for low-income and 95.5% for high-income countries). High-achieving middle-income and low-income countries such as El Salvador, Colombia, Rwanda and Malawi demonstrate that peer-relative efficiency can be attained at all incomes. Governance capacity, income and education are significantly associated with efficiency. Sensitivity analysis suggests that results are robust to changes.ConclusionWe provide a 2015 baseline for cross-country UHC technical efficiency scores. If countries wish to improve their UHC outputs within existing budgets, they should identify their current efficiency and try to emulate more efficient peers. Policy-makers should focus on strengthening institutions and implementing known best practices to replicate efficient systems. Using resources more efficiently is likely to positively impact UHC coverage goals and health outcomes, and without addressing gaps in efficiency progress towards achieving the SDGs will be impeded.

Towards universal health coverage in the WHO African Region: assessing health system functionality, incorporating lessons from COVID-19

“…We also examined its relationship with independently derived efficiency levels of health sectors. 39 To advance this efficiency analysis, we also examined the relationship between the functionality index and funding by source. This was to better understand which funding sources are most effective at improving health system functionality for attainment of universal health coverage.…”

Health system efficiency and democracy: A public choice perspective

“…The performance and efficiency of health systems has been investigated in several studies from an international perspective. While Evans et al find that health system efficiency in a sample of 191 countries between 1993–1997 varied between nearly fully inefficient to nearly fully efficient [ 24 ], the results of more recent studies indicate relatively high average efficiency levels of 80% or more [ 14 , 15 ]. Variations in health system efficiency were also investigated for subsets of countries [ 12 , 25 , 26 ] or even at the provincial level [ 27 ].…”

“…Multiple studies exploring covariates of health system efficiency find that higher levels of economic development as reflected in higher per capita income and per capita health expenditure are associated with higher efficiency [ 12 , 15 , 24 ]. There is also some evidence that countries with more concentrated populations as reflected in higher population density and urbanization have more efficient health systems [ 12 , 14 ].…”

“…Previous research has focused on estimating and comparing health system efficiency between countries and over time [ 12 – 14 ]. In addition, determinants of health system efficiency have been investigated in empirical studies [ 15 – 17 ]. However, while most of these studies focus on economic, social, or governance-related covariates of health system efficiency, the role of a countries’ political regime has been neglected.…”

The Construction and Empirical Research on the Dynamic Evaluation Model of University Science and Technology Output

“…There are several methods for evaluating the scientific research of colleges and universities, and these methods are production systems that typically have multiple inputs and multiple outputs [1]. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) [2], is a mathematical linear programming-based technique to evaluate the relative performance of organizations [3], [4]. Recent years have seen a great variety of applications of DEA for use in evaluating the performances of many different kinds of entities engaged in many different activities in many different contexts in many different countries.…”