2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the geospatial nature of location-dependent costs in installation of solar photovoltaic plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the MUFSP model is used according to (Basu et al, 2021), SPV plants and GES systems differ in nature in several respects, including in materials, practical use and functionality. However, the base location-dependent cost function is quite similar, with transmission land and supply chain costs being directly dependent on the functions (Amjad and Shah, 2020).…”
Section: Location-dependent Cost Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the MUFSP model is used according to (Basu et al, 2021), SPV plants and GES systems differ in nature in several respects, including in materials, practical use and functionality. However, the base location-dependent cost function is quite similar, with transmission land and supply chain costs being directly dependent on the functions (Amjad and Shah, 2020).…”
Section: Location-dependent Cost Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The land cost of the MUFSP model is guided by the principle of Hedonic pricing, which is an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model for determining property/land prices. Several studies have established the hedonic method to estimate the land costs in urban and suburban areas, as a function of distance from the CBD of a city along with other socio-economic predictors of land costs (Basu et al, 2021;Kain and Quigley, 1970;Ottensmann et al, 2008;Mondal et al, 2018). A land value calculation method for metropolitan suburbs is based on distances from CBD is presented in (Basu et al, 2021;Ottensmann et al, 2008;Mondal et al, 2018), where CBD distance was the most sensitive parameter for spatial land-cost distribution.…”
Section: The Land Cost Function (Cland)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations