Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions of Brazilian soybean biodiesel production

Abstract

Soybean biodiesel (B100) has been playing an important role in Brazilian energy matrix towards the national bio-based economy. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is the most widely used indicator for assessing the environmental sustainability of biodiesels and received particular attention among decision makers in business and politics, as well as consumers. Former studies have been mainly focused on the GHG emissions from the soybean cultivation, excluding other stages of the biodiesel production. Here, we present a holistic view of the total GHG emissions in four life cycle stages for soybean biodiesel. The aim of this study was to assess the GHG emissions of Brazilian soybean biodiesel production system with an integrated life cycle approach of four stages: agriculture, extraction, production and distribution. Allocation of mass and energy was applied and special attention was paid to the integrated and non-integrated industrial production chain. The results indicated that the largest source of GHG emissions, among four life cycle stages, is the agricultural stage (42–51%) for B100 produced in integrated systems and the production stage (46–52%) for B100 produced in non-integrated systems. Integration of industrial units resulted in significant reduction in life cycle GHG emissions. Without the consideration of LUC and assuming biogenic CO2 emissions is carbon neutral in our study, the calculated life cycle GHG emissions for domestic soybean biodiesel varied from 23.1 to 25.8 gCO2eq. MJ-1 B100 and those for soybean biodiesel exported to EU ranged from 26.5 to 29.2 gCO2eq. MJ-1 B100, which represent reductions by 65% up to 72% (depending on the delivery route) of GHG emissions compared with the EU benchmark for diesel fuel. Our findings from a life cycle perspective contributed to identify the major GHG sources in Brazilian soybean biodiesel production system and they can be used to guide mitigation priority for policy and decision-making. Projected scenarios in this study would be taken as references for accounting the environmental sustainability of soybean biodiesel within a domestic and global level.

The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis

“…Donald et al 2006;Raven and Wagner 2021). We found that soybean (the most important source of biodiesel in Brazil, one of the world's largest biodiesel producers (Cerri et al 2017)) severely reduced local biodiversity, more so than other row crops including maize (Fargione et al 2010;Poggio et al 2013). Yet maize and wheat were still very damaging compared to primary and secondary vegetation and second-generation biofuels, reflecting the homogeneity and limited resource availability in row crop landscapes (Smith et al 2010).…”

The promising future of microalgae: current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products

“…The selection and development of biomass is a crucial, cost-limiting phase in biofuels generation for adjusting and optimizing energy structure and cost. Selection of biomass for biofuels production is also directly related to greenhouse gas emissions, environmental and economic sustainability [ 12 ]. The current focus is on microalgae as a feedstock for bioenergy production as the most promising raw material to compensate and balance the ever-increasing demands for biofuels, food, feed and valuable chemicals production [ 9 , 10 ].…”

New application of Brewers Spent Grain for food

“…• GHG emissions attributed to 1 kg soy bean meal: in literature values varying from 0.4 kg (Mogensen, 2011), 0.5 kg (Zgola et al, 2016), 0.7kg (Cerri et al, 2017;Dalgaard et al, 2008) are found (all excluding post-harvest transport; differences due to region of sourcing, and whether or not to include land-use-change effects in consideration). Transport to Europe may add up to 0.4 kg CO2-eq.…”