Assessing the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics

Abstract

Many of the processes behind the decline of farmland birds can be related to modifications in landscape structure (composition and configuration), which can partly be expressed quantitatively with measurable or computable indices, i.e. landscape metrics. This paper aims to identify statistical relationships between the occurrence of birds and the landscape structure. We present a method that combines two comprehensive procedures: the “landscape-centred approach” and “guild classification”. Our study is based on more than 20,000 individual bird observations based on a 4-year bird monitoring approach in a typical agricultural area in the north-eastern German lowlands. Five characteristic bird guilds, each with three characteristic species, are defined for the typical habitat types of that area: farmland, grassland, hedgerow, forest and settlement. The suitability of each sample plot for each guild is indicated by the level of persistence (LOP) of occurrence of three respective species. Thus, the sample plots can be classified as “preferred” or “less preferred” depending on the lower and upper quartiles of the LOP values. The landscape structure is characterized by 16 different landscape metrics expressing various aspects of landscape composition and configuration. For each guild, the three landscape metrics with the strongest rank correlation with the LOP values and that are not mutually dependent were identified. For four of the bird guilds, the classification success was better than 80%, compared with only 66% for the grassland bird guild. A subset of six landscape metrics proved to be the most meaningful and sufficiently classified the sample areas with respect to bird guild suitability. In addition, derived logistic functions allowed the production of guild-specific habitat suitability maps for the whole landscape. The analytical results show that the proposed approach is appropriate to assess the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic bird guilds.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10661-017-5837-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes

“…Landscape metric parameters are widely used as indicators of biodiversity, water quality and land cover change [29][30][31][32][33][34] and they are still being further developed [35][36][37]. They offer a spatial tool set for analysing entire landscapes, as well as the arrangement and properties of their features.…”

Maize‐field complexity and farming system influence insectivorous birds’ contribution to arthropod herbivore regulation

“…Despite indiscernible effect of hedgerow type, whether native or exotic, hedge thickness enhanced overall field heterogeneity, possibly also providing increased nesting opportunities for some birds. Hedges may also harbor some arthropod prey to supplement those on actual crop‐fields (Borges, Glemnitz, Schultz, & Stachow, ). This may account for association of thicker hedgerows with increased bird species richness, shown earlier on.…”

Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective

“…Simple tools such as a look-up matrix (Burkhard et al, 2012;Koschke et al, 2012) could help to qualitatively relate and easily visualise the land cover composition of an area as to its capacity to provide ES. Landscape metrics are used to assess how spatial composition and pattern configuration affect changes in ecological processes (Lustig et al, 2015;Borges et al, 2017), to evaluate the supply of ES (Feld et al, 2007;Frank et al, 2012;Syrbe and Walz, 2012), and their social values (Fagerholm and Käyhkö, 2009;Sherrouse et al, 2011). Other techniques such as system dynamics modelling, landscape genetics, or agentbased modelling are also being applied to provide a spatial understanding of ecological functions, services and values (Grimm et al, 2005;Coulon et al, 2015;Etherington, 2016;Turner et al, 2016).…”