2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.199035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the hidden diversity underlying consensus sequences of SARS-CoV-2 using VICOS, a novel bioinformatic pipeline for identification of mixed viral populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are pipelines that integrate reproducible workflows to analyze genomic diversity between patients [14,15], there is a lack of easily deployable, accessible, and integrated workflows for analyzing and reporting the evolutionary trajectories of SARS-CoV-2 chronic infections. Current pipelines for processing serially-sampled sequencing data that take into account the particularities of intra-host samples are restricted to certain analyses, such as detecting mixed viral populations, or identifying chronic infections but using only consensus sequences [12,[16][17][18][19]. For this reason, carrying out this type of studies through public databases is a difficult task especially without further clinical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are pipelines that integrate reproducible workflows to analyze genomic diversity between patients [14,15], there is a lack of easily deployable, accessible, and integrated workflows for analyzing and reporting the evolutionary trajectories of SARS-CoV-2 chronic infections. Current pipelines for processing serially-sampled sequencing data that take into account the particularities of intra-host samples are restricted to certain analyses, such as detecting mixed viral populations, or identifying chronic infections but using only consensus sequences [12,[16][17][18][19]. For this reason, carrying out this type of studies through public databases is a difficult task especially without further clinical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%