2017
DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2017.1284593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the home environment during mid- and late-adolescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Items on this subscale were summed to obtain a physical environment score (PHYS) that ranged from 0 to 6 with larger numbers indicating fewer problems in the physical environment ( M = 5.036, SD = 1.537, Median = 6.0). This distribution is consistent with previous multi‐site studies that measured PHYS in over 400 socioeconomically and ethnically diverse families (Bradley, Pennar, Fuligni, & Whiteside‐Mansell, ). Because the HOME attempts to identify homes that pose a significant risk for children's development, the criteria for ‘getting credit’ on items is not high for most households in the United States and other developed countries, and mean scores for most domains are above the mid‐point (Bradley, ; Bradley et al., ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Items on this subscale were summed to obtain a physical environment score (PHYS) that ranged from 0 to 6 with larger numbers indicating fewer problems in the physical environment ( M = 5.036, SD = 1.537, Median = 6.0). This distribution is consistent with previous multi‐site studies that measured PHYS in over 400 socioeconomically and ethnically diverse families (Bradley, Pennar, Fuligni, & Whiteside‐Mansell, ). Because the HOME attempts to identify homes that pose a significant risk for children's development, the criteria for ‘getting credit’ on items is not high for most households in the United States and other developed countries, and mean scores for most domains are above the mid‐point (Bradley, ; Bradley et al., ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This distribution is consistent with previous multi‐site studies that measured PHYS in over 400 socioeconomically and ethnically diverse families (Bradley, Pennar, Fuligni, & Whiteside‐Mansell, ). Because the HOME attempts to identify homes that pose a significant risk for children's development, the criteria for ‘getting credit’ on items is not high for most households in the United States and other developed countries, and mean scores for most domains are above the mid‐point (Bradley, ; Bradley et al., ). Indeed, mean PHYS scores were near ceiling in over 400 adolescents of different ethnic groups across the United States (Bradley et al., ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Two of the six LA-HOME domains were used for the study: (1) modeling and encouragement of mature behavior, and (2) companionship and investment (see Table 1). Inter-observer agreement for the items in LA-HOME was 94%; and the Kappa coefficient was .81 (Bradley et al, 2017).…”
Section: La-homementioning
confidence: 93%
“…LA-HOME was administered in the adolescent's primary place of residence when both the adolescent and the primary parent were present (other family members are welcome but not required). Inter-observer agreement for the items in LA-HOME was 94%; and the Kappa coefficient was .81 (Bradley et al, 2017). Family members are allowed to engage in normal activities during the visit, to the extent that they wish.…”
Section: La-homementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation