2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Imaging Capabilities of Radial Mechanical and Electronic Echo-endoscopes Using the Resolution Integral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution integral has been shown to provide measurements that allows comparison between the performance of different systems when using different types of transducers (Filoux et al, 2012). Recently, Inglis et al, (2014) showed that the resolution integral can assess the imaging capabilities of radial mechanical and electronic echo-endoscopes using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom.…”
Section: The Edinburgh Pipe Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution integral has been shown to provide measurements that allows comparison between the performance of different systems when using different types of transducers (Filoux et al, 2012). Recently, Inglis et al, (2014) showed that the resolution integral can assess the imaging capabilities of radial mechanical and electronic echo-endoscopes using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom.…”
Section: The Edinburgh Pipe Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the first description of a fundamental physical approach to combining measurements of ultrasound resolution made at different depths in the image. Subsequently, visual and computational approaches to the calculation of the resolution integral were compared [10], and the resolution integral was used successfully to assess the imaging performance of endoscopes and intravascular catheters, respectively [11,12]. In addition, the resolution integral has been used to characterize high-frequency preclinical ultrasound scanners utilizing single-element, array and annular-array transducers [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 7, results for the single element mechanical IVUS transducers are displayed alongside results from previous studies that used the EPP method to characterise single element mechanical transducers used in preclinical work (Moran et al 2011b) and endoscopic ultrasound (Inglis et al 2014). Given the physical constraints of placing transducers within the body of a catheter it is not surprising to find the magnitude of the resolution integral of the IVUS catheters (range 15-19) to be slightly less but comparable to values for single element preclinical probes (range 19-25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%