2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980019002532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of food insecurity on HIV medication adherence in the context of an integrated care programme for people living with HIV in Vancouver, Canada

Abstract: Objective:Food insecurity, or self-reports of inadequate food access due to limited financial resources, remains prevalent among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We examined the impact of food insecurity on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) adherence within an integrated care programme that provides services to PLHIV, including two meals per day.Design:Adjusted OR (aOR) were estimated by generalized estimating equations, quantifying the relationship between food insecurity (exposure) and cART adherence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other Canadian studies have reported optimal medication adherence among 55% and 67% among HIV patients, respectively. 37,38 Our participation rates were higher than those reported in the literature in outpatient clinics using tablet-based PROs as standard of care. 16,20,39,40 Kjaer et al described the implementation of PROs in HIV clinics in which an invitation letter with a link to PRO was sent to patients 14 days prior to their scheduled appointment and patients could respond to the questionnaire through a web-based interface from home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Two other Canadian studies have reported optimal medication adherence among 55% and 67% among HIV patients, respectively. 37,38 Our participation rates were higher than those reported in the literature in outpatient clinics using tablet-based PROs as standard of care. 16,20,39,40 Kjaer et al described the implementation of PROs in HIV clinics in which an invitation letter with a link to PRO was sent to patients 14 days prior to their scheduled appointment and patients could respond to the questionnaire through a web-based interface from home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These adherence rates were higher than those reported in real-world observational studies or claims database studies conducted in Canada, which showed that 56% to 67% of PWH had ≥95% adherence using either refill compliance or proportion of days covered to measure adherence. [29][30][31] Using proportion of days covered, one US claims database study reported that 52% to 64% of PWH had ≥95% adherence, while another reported that 58% had ≥80% adherence. 32,33 By contrast, other Canadian and US claims database studies reported 86% to 93% of PWH had ≥80% adherence using proportion of days covered, similar to the ≥80% adherence rates observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiser et al [98] found that individuals who reported any food insecurity were 29% more likely to be virologically non-suppressed (aOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04, 1.61); however, the same study [98] found no difference in virological suppression among food insecure individuals after adjusting for adherence. Six studies investigating food security and adherence found a significant negative adjusted association [42,56,64,65,67,98]. For instance, Almeida-Brasil et al [42] examined a cohort of adults in Canada living with HIV and hepatitis C and established that there was no difference in virological suppression (VL > 50 copies/mL) among individuals reporting income-related food insecurity (aOR 1.44; 95% CI 0.95, 2.19) but were more likely to be non-adherent to medication (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.26, 2.48).…”
Section: Food Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%