2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00035-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of the pandemic in children and adolescents: SARS-CoV-2 infection and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…response rates thus a better or worse representation of the entire paediatric population), gender imbalance, recall bias and the higher awareness for this syndrome due to extensive media coverage. 15 The presence of at least five symptoms in our study is 9.9% vs 4.3%, lower than the rate reported by the CLOCK study (23.7% vs 3.8%). The age differences in both studies can explain this.…”
Section: Open Accesscontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…response rates thus a better or worse representation of the entire paediatric population), gender imbalance, recall bias and the higher awareness for this syndrome due to extensive media coverage. 15 The presence of at least five symptoms in our study is 9.9% vs 4.3%, lower than the rate reported by the CLOCK study (23.7% vs 3.8%). The age differences in both studies can explain this.…”
Section: Open Accesscontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the residual difference was only 0.8%, implicating a very low prevalence of long COVID in children attributable to the infection itself 14. These differences were addressed by Molteni herself and explained by some possible reasons: different study design, different response rates (and thus a better or worse representation of the entire paediatric population), gender imbalance, recall bias and the higher awareness for this syndrome due to extensive media coverage 15…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already anticipated, younger people are no strangers to the psychological and social burden that has resulted from COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies investigating the long-term effect of COVID-19 on children and adolescents have surprisingly suggested that, for all outcomes related to the psychological and social sphere, young subjects who did not develop COVID-19 reported even more frequent problems than their counterparts who instead developed the disease [ 17 , 18 ]. However, the two extremes of life present substantial differences in terms of the needed psycho–social support.…”
Section: Psycho–social Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 This approach has led to an unfruitful discussion focusing on whether PCCs are a real entity in children, or a psychological consequence of social restrictions. 3 In turn, such an approach risks hindering funds availability for the management and in‐depth biomolecular studies for the characterization of pediatric PCCs. As a consequence, families are struggling to find answers to their children's illnesses.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%