2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impacts of uncertain future closure costs when evaluating strategies for tailings management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity analysis of inputs related to mine closure had the least effect on ST, which could be an asset worth considering in feasibility and planning stages for new mines. 41…”
Section: Dewatered Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensitivity analysis of inputs related to mine closure had the least effect on ST, which could be an asset worth considering in feasibility and planning stages for new mines. 41…”
Section: Dewatered Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the life of a hypothetical 40 000 t/d TSF, the ST facility showed a linear cost increase, and a thickened tailings facility showed step costs associated with introducing new cells to accommodate increased volumes as processing continued (Figure ). Sensitivity analysis of inputs related to mine closure had the least effect on ST, which could be an asset worth considering in feasibility and planning stages for new mines …”
Section: Dewatered Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that only capital and operational costs were included in the analyses. Closure costs, albeit very important to be considered in the evaluation of tailings management options and which can ultimately affect the finances of a TSF project (Carneiro & Fourie 2020), have been excluded from the discussion presented in this paper.…”
Section: Overview Of the Tsfs Operated By Rio Tinto Iron Orementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tailings' composition depends on the nature of the processed ores and the separation techniques adopted [5][6][7][8]. Typically, tailings are in the form of fine gangue particles ranging from 1 to 600 µm in size and mixed with process water and (sometimes) chemical reagents [9][10][11]. These are discharged as slurries into lagoons or tailings ponds at the mine site to permit the gravity separation of wastewater from solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%