Assessing the Integration of Climate Change and Development Strategies at Local Levels: Insights from Muheza District, Tanzania

Abstract

Integration of climate change measures in local development planning and delivery of Climate Compatible Development (CCD) at local levels is widely advocated to assist achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Such integration is not straightforward, and limited knowledge on multi-level governance of CCD exists. To progress this critical enquiry, we build on the concept of Climate Policy Integration (CPI) to assess how climate change measures are integrated in local development planning. We investigate the existing institutional arrangements across local levels (village to district) and sectors, and the barriers to and opportunities for CCD within local government authorities (LGAs). Particularly, we draw on qualitative analysis of local development policy and interviews conducted with LGAs in Muheza District of Tanzania. Findings show that several barriers, including under-resourcing, unreliable information on climate impacts, and the lack of guidelines for climate-development in key national policies are hindering the process towards CCD in local development planning. This study suggests that building capacity both within LGAs and at the national level are required to achieve CCD at sub-national levels. Currently, measures to address climate change are mostly implemented by development partners, so coordination between LGAs and these external stakeholders is essential to ensure consistency between climate and development objectives. Finally, our findings support a flexible approach to CCD, where emphasis on each of the three components of CCD-mitigation, adaptation, and development-can vary across time and space.

Building adaptive capacity: Reducing the climate vulnerability of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe

“…Building individual capacities certainly leads to household resilience, but these also need to be coordinated by households themselves and get support from right policies. As indicated by Pilato, Sallu, and Gaworek‐Michalezenia (), climate governance is relevant for integrated planning and policymaking across a variety of sectors. It recognises that national policy frameworks facilitate a strong top‐down approach that requires coordinated governance institutions that are able to translate higher level policy into local action plans (Corfee‐Morlot et al, ).…”

Drivers and Benefits of Integrating Climate Adaptation Measures into Urban Development: Experience from Coastal Cities of Indonesia

“…Some of the adaptation practices have been discovered in Indonesia's municipalities, such as building adaptive capacity (e.g., research, awareness-raising, training, and advocacy), creating a suitable institutional environment (e.g., city team workforce), and implementing adaptation (e.g., mangrove plantation) [43]. From the previous studies [9,38,[44][45][46], some influencing drivers for integration process can be found, including the officers' motivation, initiative, and leadership, the assistance, and support by government and international development agencies, the existence of policy direction and guideline as well as the political will of decision-makers.…”

Morphological Indices as Urban Planning Tools in Northeastern Brazil

“…The authors in [5] demonstrate that the urbanization process affects climate at all scales. Several studies have shown strategies to minimize the impact of growth and of urban density on climate using urban planning as a tool to control land usage and coverage, as well as reduce the impact of the urbanization process [6][7][8]16,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The relation between the urbanization process and climate is complex.…”

“…Different methods and techniques exist to analyze urban morphological indices, ranging from the use of spatial metrics [31][32][33][34][42][43][44], as is the case of the present study, to the use of satellite images [45][46][47][48][49][50]. Several indices may be used in such analyses, such as aerodynamic roughness, porosity, building density, verticality, H/W ratio, and impervious surface fraction, helping to minimize the impacts caused by city growth.…”