Assessing the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program as a conditional income transfer: a search for a conceptual framework

Abstract

Purpose Ghana has implemented different kinds of pro-poor program and policies since its independence to reduce poverty. The Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) is one of such program. LEAP is a social cash transfer program and its implementation has been under the auspices of the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection since 2008. It provides direct cash and health insurance coverage for extremely poor households across the country to alleviate short-term poverty and encourage long-term human capital development. This paper examines the LEAP program in terms of how it has achieved its aim and the opportunities for improvement.Design/methodology/approach Primary data were obtained from interviews of 110 beneficiaries of the program. The study proposes a conceptual framework that links poverty reduction and social policies to assist researchers analyze pro-poor or social cash transfer program.Findings The findings show that the program is challenged with administrative bureaucracies, irregular inflow of funds, perceived political interferences, inconsistent implementation strategies and low value of the cash transfer (which results in little or no impact on consumption). However, the data also show that LEAP has positive impacts on nonconsumption spending like children's schooling. The program' exit strategy does not impact much on beneficiaries to allow them exit without the tendency of being poor.Practical implications This paper discussed the LEAP program as a social cash transfer to the poor in Ghana. The study constructed a conceptual framework to help researchers and practitioners analyze the implementation of pro-poor interventions. This conceptualization allows for cash transfer program to empower beneficiaries and exits them to allow for other beneficiaries to enroll, ensuring reduction in poverty over time. Generally, the beneficiaries have benefited from the LEAP in the areas of consumption, education and healthcare with few beneficiaries being able to accumulate some few assets. The LEAP program has no exit plan.Originality/value This study adds to literature by offering a conceptual framework to help researchers and policy makers in dealing with social assistance policies to the poor. The study also gave an insight into how pro-poor policy strategies could be crafted.

Sustainable Way to Eradicate Poverty through Social Protection: The Case of Sri Lanka

“…Nirere (2022) found that social protection helps to manage the risk of the poor in Rwanda, even though social protection has not lifted the poor above the national poverty line, by analyzing the cash transfer program. Karakara and Ortsin (2022) found little or no impact of social protection on consumption by analyzing the cash transfer program in Ghana. However, there is a positive impact on non-consumption spending, such as children's schooling.…”

“…Especially, education-related social protection coverage should be expanded to capture the issues of poor and extremely poor households since the universal system does not better target their difficulties. Karakara and Ortsin (2022) found that social protection has a positive impact on non-consumption expenditure such as education.…”

Is the fulfilment of objective wellbeing reflected in subjective wellbeing? A case study of vulnerable communities in Volta Delta, Ghana

“…However, despite potential objective benefits, several hypothesised mechanisms could be driving unhappiness in these communities: (i) formalised less-vulnerable livelihood options can increase material aspirations, which if unmet can reduce happiness (Alem et al, 2014), (ii) lower social capital and trust in peri-urban areas could promote inequalities and individualistic wellbeing conceptualisations, which can increase relative comparisons to "better-off" households (Reyes-García et al, 2016;Tibesigwa et al, 2016), (iii) experience or fear of coastal climatic risks, such as flooding, can cause psychological damage and lower SWB (Sekulova & Van den Bergh, 2016), (iv) past state interventions, such as Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programmes in Sogakope, being removed without an effective exit plan can restrict long-term development goals and subsequently reduce happiness by creating a continued dependence upon state support (Karakara & Ortsin, 2022;Ohemeng et al, 2020;Osei-Tutu et al, 2020).…”