2011
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2011.536645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the mathematical thinking of young children in New Zealand: the initial school years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aforementioned factors may appear to be stand alone, but their joint forces contribute to the Aboriginal students' disengagement in learning, which is a significant predictor of success and academic excellence (Lee, 2014). Additionally, their readiness for school and learning mathematics was found to be at par with the non-Aboriginal students (Dockett & Perry, 2013) and the attributing factor that reverses the effects of readiness was found to be engagement towards learning (Young-Loveridge, 2011). Miller and Armour (2019) further clarified the negative effects of student engagement from the perspectives of behaviour (curriculum and cocurriculum participation), emotional (affection towards mathematics content) and cognitive engagement (ability and motivation to sustain the difficulty of grasping mathematical concepts and problem solving) that results in students' inactive participation in classroom learning, dislike for mathematics and demotivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aforementioned factors may appear to be stand alone, but their joint forces contribute to the Aboriginal students' disengagement in learning, which is a significant predictor of success and academic excellence (Lee, 2014). Additionally, their readiness for school and learning mathematics was found to be at par with the non-Aboriginal students (Dockett & Perry, 2013) and the attributing factor that reverses the effects of readiness was found to be engagement towards learning (Young-Loveridge, 2011). Miller and Armour (2019) further clarified the negative effects of student engagement from the perspectives of behaviour (curriculum and cocurriculum participation), emotional (affection towards mathematics content) and cognitive engagement (ability and motivation to sustain the difficulty of grasping mathematical concepts and problem solving) that results in students' inactive participation in classroom learning, dislike for mathematics and demotivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children learn most effectively when there is a partnership between parents and teachers, a sense of community between home and school and when they feel safe and valued (Dockett and Perry 2013 ). Studies (Woods 2004 ; Young-Loveridge 2011 ) have shown a positive relationship between parental involvement in their children’s schooling and numeracy achievement. Prior-to-school numeracy language and understandings need to develop as naturally as possible from children’s social contexts (Dockett and Perry 2013 ; Turunen and Dockett 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dockett and Perry ( 2013 ) found that children from disadvantaged backgrounds attended formal schooling with the same readiness to learn as compared with children from less disadvantaged backgrounds. The difference between both groups depended on their engagement with early number language and processes involving understanding number sequence, identifying ordinal positioning and simple word problems (Young-Loveridge 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%