2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance and cost of oil spill remediation technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current methods of controlling oil spills include using booms (Hubbe et al, 2013), skimming (Kinner et al, 2014), and burning the oil on the surface of the water (Prendergast and Gschwend, 2014). These techniques are time consuming and energy inefficient, and they create pollution and require excessive energy for recovery of the oil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current methods of controlling oil spills include using booms (Hubbe et al, 2013), skimming (Kinner et al, 2014), and burning the oil on the surface of the water (Prendergast and Gschwend, 2014). These techniques are time consuming and energy inefficient, and they create pollution and require excessive energy for recovery of the oil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding sorbents, these materials are typically most effective in oil capture if they are hydrophobic and have high surface area, low specific gravity and high buoyancy in water . Mechanical recovery of the oil and sorbent reuse are also desirable features, and low cost is critical for uptake in the field . Impressive advances have been made for both sorbents and membranes, with highly effective materials reported for oil separation and recovery from water .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow and inefficient responses to oil spills have catastrophic and far‐reaching implications for the livelihood of local populations and the environment . Various technologies and devices have been proposed for oil remediation, such as, in situ burning at the spill site, dissipation with dispersants, and recovery with mechanical skimmers or vacuums . However, in some cases, these methods can have additional negative environmental impacts or demonstrate a low oil–water separation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%