2020
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance of statistical classifiers to discriminate fish stocks using Fourier analysis of otolith shape

Abstract: The assignment of individual fish to its stock of origin is important for reliable stock assessment and fisheries management. Otolith shape is commonly used as the marker of distinct stocks in discrimination studies. Our literature review showed that the application and comparison of alternative statistical classifiers to discriminate fish stocks based on otolith shape is limited. Therefore, we compared the performance of two traditional and four machine learning classifiers based on Fourier analysis of otolit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the neural network was slightly more accurate than the LDA model, with the accuracy at classifying the wild individuals being higher in the former, whereas the accuracy of stocked individuals being higher in the later model. The higher accuracy of machine learning methods over more traditional statistical tests observed in this study corroborates the finds of Smoliński et al, (2019), but, in our case, the difference seems to be small and not true for all groups (i.e. stocked fish).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the neural network was slightly more accurate than the LDA model, with the accuracy at classifying the wild individuals being higher in the former, whereas the accuracy of stocked individuals being higher in the later model. The higher accuracy of machine learning methods over more traditional statistical tests observed in this study corroborates the finds of Smoliński et al, (2019), but, in our case, the difference seems to be small and not true for all groups (i.e. stocked fish).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The number of hidden layers were selected based on the number of input variables in the model (2/3 of the size of input layers plus the size of output layers). Machine learning tools outperform traditional statistical classifiers in otolith shape analysis and can improve the accuracy of fish stock discrimination studies (Smoliński et al, 2019). The relative importance of each variable was assessed by the Olden's algorithm (Olden and Jackson, 2002) using the olden function of the NeuralNetTools package (Beck, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to Fourier descriptors, shape indices are expected to be less sensitive to subtle variation in otolith shape [ 82 , 83 ]. Moreover, Fourier descriptors and shape indices are supposed to be partially redundant information since Fourier descriptors are precise reconstructions of otolith outline whereas shape indices are considered as less integrative, yet accurate, metrics [ 84 ]. To our knowledge, not any study has previously presented spatially heterogeneous shape indices in a single analysis without significant spatial signal in Fourier descriptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification using random forests.-We used random forests to classify fish to genetic lineage, using observed phenotypic traits, based on their proven predictive performance relative to similar classification procedures (Breiman 2001; Maguffee et al 2019;Smolinski et al 2020). We restricted fish inclusion to only those assigned to a tule or upriver bright reporting group; all other groups were either identified readily using unique fin clip markings or were rare among sampled fish.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%