2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Permeability of Landscape Features to Animal Movement: Using Genetic Structure to Infer Functional Connectivity

Abstract: Human-altered environments often challenge native species with a complex spatial distribution of resources. Hostile landscape features can inhibit animal movement (i.e., genetic exchange), while other landscape attributes facilitate gene flow. The genetic attributes of organisms inhabiting such complex environments can reveal the legacy of their movements through the landscape. Thus, by evaluating landscape attributes within the context of genetic connectivity of organisms within the landscape, we can elucidat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with the Bayesian clustering results and previous fine‐scale studies (Anderson et al. ), our landscape genetic analysis suggests that forests promote gene flow between study cells for chipmunks. Complexity of forested habitat within study cells may also play a role in explaining patterns of genetic differentiation in chipmunks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combined with the Bayesian clustering results and previous fine‐scale studies (Anderson et al. ), our landscape genetic analysis suggests that forests promote gene flow between study cells for chipmunks. Complexity of forested habitat within study cells may also play a role in explaining patterns of genetic differentiation in chipmunks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Previous studies have documented that landscape configuration between populations impact gene flow in both chipmunks (Anderson et al. ) and white‐footed mice (Munshi‐South ), so we expected configuration to be correlated with genetic differentiation in both species. Within the UWB, chipmunks and white‐footed mice are fairly ubiquitous (Moore and Swihart ), but multiple measures of landscape complexity within study cells have been related to variance in abundance (Rizkalla and Swihart ) and occupancy (Moore and Swihart ) within the study area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we were only able to use coarse categories of matrix types because in most cases fragments are surrounded by a mosaic of different habitat types and most studies did not provide sufficient details. Thus, permeability studies contribute to explain species-specific genetic patterns in fragmented landscapes (Anderson et al 2015, Cooney et al 2015. This complexity may partially explain why studies rarely provided detailed information on matrix type.…”
Section: Matrix Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of 57 an animal to use resources within a landscape patch is determined not only by the distance between 58 patches but also by the nature of the routes connecting them (Taylor et al 1993). Consequently, the 59 degree of isolation between subpopulations depends on the actual capacity of movement of the 60 species in relation to the landscape heterogeneity (Bowne & Bowers 2004; Anderson et al 2015). 61…”
Section: Introduction 50mentioning
confidence: 99%