Assessing the Political Risks in Eurasia in the Wake of the Fifth China’s “Grand Strategy”

Abstract

Political risk assessment (PRA) is usually performed at the national polity level. With a novel and globally significant reality exposed in the Belt and Road Initiative, the vast Eurasian space has risen high on the political risk assessment agenda. This has especially become dominant in Western academic narratives. How the various PRAs find their place in practice is an issue that constitutes a significant scientific void. This study aims to supplement such vivid endeavours by reviewing the current state of research and applying its findings to three regions: China's geographical neighbourhood, Southeast and Central Europe, and Central Asia and the Middle East. Firstly, the findings of several major studies into the fifth so-called "Grand Strategy" of the People's Republic of China as a major driver of its security policy will be contextualized. This will be followed by two segments, one which will stress the rudiments of PRA both in terms of the geographical realm and the modus operandi of the process. The second segment is devoted to contemporary scientific endeavours that include Big Data and deployment of artificial intelligence tools to determine the level and nature of political risk across the BRI space. After the findings are systematized, their implications for the BRI countries in the wake of the latest challenges will be underlined, such as the investment critiques and the decline in euphoria about the format "17+1". The results demonstrate a significant change in the components of political risk for most of the Eurasian countries, which will consequently influence the process of reformulation of China's foreign and security policy preferences.

New Balance of Power in the International Relations and the Role of China

“…Instead, China is concentrating on strengthening its own presence in different regions, by different means. Lađevac and Stekić (2021) contextualize the political risks linked to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) within the framework of China's Fifth Grand Strategy. They assert that within the Eurasian space, the BRI presents various political risks, including the potential for sudden changes in political regime types, fluctuations in foreign direct investment (FDI) flows, and challenges to the stability and peace of certain microregions (2021, p. 58).…”

Foreign Trade Commodity Exchange Between the Countries of the Former SFRY

“…Slovenia's largest import partner is China (the volume of exports was USD 6,479,914 in 2021), and the most important import goods are organic chemicals, electrical machines, and equipment. Through the "Belt and Road Initiative", China initiated cooperation with a large number of countries and opened space for capital investment projects (Zakić 2022), which has recently intensified its presence in a wide range of geographical areas (Lađevac and Stekić 2021;Lađevac and Jović-Lazić 2022).…”