Antibodies
are crucial biomolecules that bring high therapeutic
efficacy in medicine and accurate molecular detection in diagnosis.
Many studies have been devoted to analyzing the antigen–antibody
interaction from the importance of understanding the antibody recognition
mechanism. However, most of the previous studies examined the characteristic
of the antibody for interaction. It is also informative to clarify
the significant antigen residues contributing to the binding. To characterize
the molecular interaction of antigens, we computationally analyzed
350 antigen–antibody complex structures by molecular mechanics
(MM) calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Based on
the MM calculations, the antigen residues contributing to the binding
were extracted from all the 350 complexes. The extracted residues
are located at the antigen–antibody interface and are responsible
for making contact with the antibody. The appearances of the charged
polar residues, Asp, Glu, Arg, and Lys, were noticeably large. In
contrast, the populations of the hydrophobic residues, Leu, Val, and
Ala, were relatively low. The appearance frequencies of the other
amino acid residues were almost close to the abundance of general
proteins of eukaryotes. The binding score indicated that the hydrophilic
interaction was dominant at the antigen–antibody contact instead
of the hydrophobic one. The positively charged residues, Arg and Lys,
remarkably contributed to the binding compared to the negatively charged
ones, Asp and Glu. Considerable contributions were also observed for
the noncharged polar residues, Asn and Gln. The analysis of the secondary
structures of the extracted antigen residues suggested that there
was no marked difference in recognition by antibodies among helix,
sheet, turn, and coil. A long helix of the antigen sometimes made
contact with antibody complementarity-determining regions, and a large
sheet also frequently covered the antibody heavy and light chains.
The turn structure was the most popularly observed at the contact
with antibody among 350 complexes. Three typical complexes were picked
up for each of the four secondary structures. MD simulations were
performed to examine the stability of the interfacial structures of
the antigens for these 12 complex models. The alterations of secondary
structures were monitored through the simulations. The structural
fluctuations of the contact residues were low compared with the other
domains of antigen molecules. No drastic conversion was observed for
every model during the 100 ns simulation. The motions of the interfacial
antigen residues were small compared to the other residues on the
protein surface. Therefore, diverse molecular conformations are possible
for antibody recognition as long as the target areas are polar, nonflexible,
and protruding on the protein surface.