2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712177105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the potential of mutational strategies to elicit new phenotypes in industrial strains

Abstract: Industrial strains have been traditionally improved by rational approaches and combinatorial methods involving mutagenesis and selection. Recently, other methods have emerged, such as the use of artificial transcription factors and engineering of the native ones. As methods for generating genetic diversity continue to proliferate, the need for quantifying phenotypic diversity and, hence, assessing the potential of various genetic libraries for strain improvement becomes more pronounced. Here, we present a metr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) compared to ϳ40% in the case of rpoD as measured by the same method (48). Despite these results, we do not believe that this constitutes sufficient evidence for favoring one target or the other; instead, we have argued that a better measure of the usefulness of a library is related to the a priori probability of finding improved mutants (22), not to whether a particular target delivers a phenotype of interest or not. However, we do believe that mutagenesis of the alpha subunit may complement the use of sigma factors because it is permanently bound to the RNAP holoenzyme and has been shown to interact with most, if not all promoters (38), circumventing the fact that some transcriptional states may be hard to access by D in certain conditions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4) compared to ϳ40% in the case of rpoD as measured by the same method (48). Despite these results, we do not believe that this constitutes sufficient evidence for favoring one target or the other; instead, we have argued that a better measure of the usefulness of a library is related to the a priori probability of finding improved mutants (22), not to whether a particular target delivers a phenotype of interest or not. However, we do believe that mutagenesis of the alpha subunit may complement the use of sigma factors because it is permanently bound to the RNAP holoenzyme and has been shown to interact with most, if not all promoters (38), circumventing the fact that some transcriptional states may be hard to access by D in certain conditions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Second, since the alpha and sigma units regulate promoter preferences by different mechanisms, combining these mutants within the same strain could result in synergistic transcriptional responses unachievable by either subunit tested separately. Although such combinations significantly increase the number of possible libraries, the use of a previously developed phenotypic diversity metric (22) could aid in designing better ones, e.g., by increasing or decreasing the mutagenesis rate in these expanded libraries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations