2005
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the predictive performance of artifIcial neural network-based classifiers based on different data preprocessing methods, distributions and training mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also investigated the implication of three types of crossover operator, such as uniform, arihtmetic and one-point crossover, on the prediction performance of GA-based ANN and found no significant difference between these different crossover operators. In Costea and Nastac (2005), the authors used GA-based ANN training to improve the performance of an already trained ANN classification model, but the genetic algorithm was unable to improve the accuracy of the ANN model. This result might be due to the high accuracy rate of the trained network that the genetic algorithm had to improve (in excess of 90%).…”
Section: Second Stage Of the Methodology: Building The Performance CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also investigated the implication of three types of crossover operator, such as uniform, arihtmetic and one-point crossover, on the prediction performance of GA-based ANN and found no significant difference between these different crossover operators. In Costea and Nastac (2005), the authors used GA-based ANN training to improve the performance of an already trained ANN classification model, but the genetic algorithm was unable to improve the accuracy of the ANN model. This result might be due to the high accuracy rate of the trained network that the genetic algorithm had to improve (in excess of 90%).…”
Section: Second Stage Of the Methodology: Building The Performance CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic classification model based on a neural approach, adapted from Costea and Nastac (2005) is based on some preliminary steps: pre-processing data and separating data into training (TR) and test (TS) sets. After that, the proper ANN architecture is constructed, by determining the proper number of hidden layers and the appropriate number of neurons in each hidden layer.…”
Section: Second Stage Of the Methodology: Building The Performance CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each eigenvalue needs to be transformed in the order of magnitude to make it within the range of (0, 10). This range is selected based on the existing research on data pre-processing [18,19].…”
Section: An Improved Methods Of Data Pre-processing For Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, MLP is the most popular neural network method that has been widely used for many practical applications, and one good reason is that able to learn non-linear representations. It has been widely employed for modeling, prediction, classification, clustering, and optimization purposes (Ahmed, 2005;Bose, 2007;Costea & Nastac, 2005;De Gooijer & Hyndman, 2006;Do, Taherifar, & Vu, 2019;Ramchoun, Idrissi, Ghanou, & Ettaouil, 2017;Zacharis, 2016).…”
Section: Market Segmentation and Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%