Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors

Abstract

[1] The quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors in upper, middle, and lower troposphere for the period 2000-2011 were investigated using satellite observations from three microwave water vapor channels operating at 183.31˙1, 183.31˙3, and 183.31˙7 GHz. The radiosonde data were partitioned based on sensor type into 19 classes. The satellite brightness temperatures (Tb) were simulated using radiosonde profiles and a radiative transfer model, then the radiosonde simulated Tb's were compared with the observed Tb's from the satellites. The surface affected Tb's were excluded from the comparison due to the lack of reliable surface emissivity data at the microwave frequencies. Daytime and nighttime data were examined separately to see the possible effect of daytime radiation bias on the sonde data. The error characteristics among different radiosondes vary significantly, which largely reflects the differences in sensor type. These differences are more evident in the mid-upper troposphere than in the lower troposphere, mainly because some of the sensors stop responding to tropospheric humidity somewhere in the upper or even in the middle troposphere. In the upper troposphere, most sensors have a dry bias but Russian sensors and a few other sensors including GZZ2, VZB2, and RS80H have a wet bias. In middle troposphere, Russian sensors still have a wet bias but all other sensors have a dry bias. All sensors, including Russian sensors, have a dry bias in lower troposphere. The systematic and random errors generally decrease from upper to lower troposphere. Sensors from China, India, Russia, and the U.S. have a large random error in upper troposphere, which indicates that these sensors are not suitable for upper tropospheric studies as they fail to respond to humidity changes in the upper and even middle troposphere. Overall, Vaisala sensors perform better than other sensors throughout the troposphere exhibiting the smallest systematic and random errors. Because of the large differences between different radiosonde humidity sensors, it is important for long-term trend studies to only use data measured using a single type of sensor at any given station. If multiple sensor types are used then it is necessary to consider the bias between sensor types and its possible dependence on humidity and temperature.Citation: Moradi, I., B. Soden, R. Ferraro, P. Arkin, and H. Vömel (2013), Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors,

Estimation of atmospheric mixing layer height from radiosonde data

“…Furthermore, the radiosonde humidity sensor can introduce systematic errors in clod and dry or cloudy conditions (Seibert et al, 2000;Moradi et al, 2013). Refractivity and specific humidity can be dominated by the water vapour pressure variations at lower altitudes, and they decrease rapidly with height von Engeln and Teixeira, 2013).…”

Arctic warming, moisture increase and circulation changes observed in the Ny-Ålesund homogenized radiosonde record

“…Numerous studies on climatological trends from long-term radiosonde data records have identified difficulties with inhomogeneity within a single station's data record (e.g. Gaffen 1994;Zhang and Seidel 2011) or among data records from a subset of the global radiosonde stations (Soden and Lanzante 1996;Moradi et al 2013). Lately, several attempts for radiosonde data homogenization by statistical methods have been developed to overcome discontinuities in the station's radiosonde data record (Lanzante 1996;Gruber and Haimberger 2008;Dai et al 2011).…”

Validation of GOME-2/MetOp-A total water vapour column using reference radiosonde data from the GRUAN network

“…Miloshevich et al, 2006;Moradi et al, 2013). The high quality of this setup has enabled its participation in radiosonde inter-comparison campaigns under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (e.g.…”