Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing

Vietnamese EFL Students’ Perceptions of Noticing-Based Collaborative Feedback on Their Writing Performance

“…These views confirm what Barnawi (2010), Hattie and Timperly (2007), and stated regarding the potential of CF in writing. Further, the findings were supported by those of the previous studies (Bitchener, 2008;Chandler, 2003;Diab, 2011;Lopez-Serrano et al, 2010;Rassaei, 2013;Shintani & Ellis, 2013). Thus, it may be stated that the higher the frequency of scaffolding and interdependence students experienced, the better the outcomes were; indeed, the main agents of the learning process saw such feedback practice as leading to improvement.…”

The Effect of Peer Reviewing on Writing Apprehension and Essay Writing Ability of Prospective EFL Teachers

“…Peer reviewing is a powerful learning tool (e.g. Mangelsdorf, 1992;Diab, 2011;etc. ) which provides students with an authentic audience; increases their motivation to write; enables them to receive different views on their writing and read their own writing critically; and assists them in gaining confidence in their writing (Mittan, 1989).…”

Comparison of the Effects of Peer- versus Self-editing on Linguistic Accuracy of Iranian EFL Students

“…He adds that peer-editing technique provides a driving force for students to revise their writings and helps them develop critical thinking skills. The effectiveness of peer-editing versus self-editing on students" revisions of linguistic errors was also investigated in some studies (Diab 2010, 2011, Sadeghi & Daulati Baneh 2012. For instance, Diab (2010) compared the efficacy of self-editing to peer-editing in improving students' revised drafts.…”