2013
DOI: 10.1519/jpt.0b013e318248e20d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Shorter Walk Test Compared With the 10-Meter Walk Test for Measurements of Gait Speed in Healthy, Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
305
4
20

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
305
4
20
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study in a homogeneous population of healthy elderly showed an excellent agreement in walking speed assessed with the 4-and 10-m walking tests (Peters et al 2013), which is comparable with our results. A lower ICC value with larger 95 % LOA compared with aforementioned study can be explained by a difference in the study population and sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study in a homogeneous population of healthy elderly showed an excellent agreement in walking speed assessed with the 4-and 10-m walking tests (Peters et al 2013), which is comparable with our results. A lower ICC value with larger 95 % LOA compared with aforementioned study can be explained by a difference in the study population and sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relative agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1 ) (Shrout and Fleiss 1979). The ICC values were interpreted as excellent (0.75 or higher), fair to good (0.40 to 0.75), or poor (0.40 or lower) (Peters et al 2013). The association of cognitive performance and cardiopulmonary diseases with walking speed assessed by three different walking tests was tested using linear regression analysis without and with adjustments for age and gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zum Schluss misst der Ten-meter-walk-Test (10mWT, in m/s.) die Geschwindigkeit beim Gehen in einem normalen Tempo und die Maximalgeschwindigkeit, ohne zu laufen [34].…”
Section: Funktionelle Leistungsfähigkeitunclassified
“…24,25 This situation can be explained by the expression of confounding factors, which are based on the demographic and anthropometric aspects specific to each sample, which emerge from the use of diverse populations, such as Caucasian, 8 and Latin American. 25 Furthermore, indicating the importance of the measuring methodology, a high level of confidence has been demonstrated for the use of a straight unidirectional 10 meter track, 26 which is considered a sufficient distance for the expression of gait in normal execution conditions. 27 In such context, the justification of the use of an elliptical track 70 meters in length in the present study was based on clinometric factors, as it reduces the neuromotor component in accelerations and decelerations, 28 in addition to ensuring sufficient time and distance to extrapolate advanced activities of daily living 10,29 such as transport to community centers and health.…”
Section: Average Gait Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%