2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001416-200007000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability of Grading Reflective Journal Writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that finding codes related to reflection on learning, and in particular codes corresponding to deeper levels of reflection, would provide evidence for the effectiveness of the exercise. To evaluate the level of reflection, the codes were classified according to four categories adapted from Boud et al (1985) and Williams et al (2000). The four categories were: (a) description of feelings, attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses; (b) analysis of the impact of these descriptions on learning; (c) integrating the analysis to the learning environment (e.g., new understanding or actions towards transformation); and (d) outcomes of the reflection and future behaviors.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We hypothesized that finding codes related to reflection on learning, and in particular codes corresponding to deeper levels of reflection, would provide evidence for the effectiveness of the exercise. To evaluate the level of reflection, the codes were classified according to four categories adapted from Boud et al (1985) and Williams et al (2000). The four categories were: (a) description of feelings, attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses; (b) analysis of the impact of these descriptions on learning; (c) integrating the analysis to the learning environment (e.g., new understanding or actions towards transformation); and (d) outcomes of the reflection and future behaviors.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings are not surprising because reflection is a process that develops over time and it is unlikely that all students equally matured in this process during the course of the semester. Reflection might not lead to immediate benefits in academic achievement but rather have a more general positive impact on the student experience by stimulating deep approaches to study, encouraging metacognitive awareness, enhancing lifelong learning, increasing motivation, providing an outlet for the affective aspects of learning, and improving student-teacher relations (e.g., Boud et al, 1985;Elwood & Klenowski, 2002;Kraayenoord & Paris, 1997;Lopez & Kossack, 2007;Mezirow, 1990;McDonald & Boud, 2003;Reynolds & Trehan, 2000;Shepard, 2000;Spalding & Wilson, 2002;Tan, 2008;Williams et al, 2000). It would be interesting for future studies to incorporate valid measures of other aspects of the student experience, for example the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI; Schraw & Dennison, 1994), to quantify the benefits of reflection.…”
Section: Was the Exercise Effective In Promoting Reflection?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations