2003
DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.11.2.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of Nursing Outcomes Classification in Home Care Settings

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the validity, inter-rater reliability, and sensitivity of 36 clinically useful of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) results for Home Care (HC) settings. The results of inter-rater reliability, criterion-related validity, and sensitivity evaluations of 36 NOC outcomes were compiled from a 10-site regional evaluation of the NOC. Findings of HC and all sites data were contrasted. More than 90% of the inter-rater reliability scores on the 36 NOC outcome label… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the objectives of the present study was to identify factors associated with ISHM in polymedicated patients. To identify patients with ineffective management of their medication regimens, we selected the NANDA‐I criteria that best defined the ISHM diagnosis and the NOC indicators that related most directly to the management of medication therapy, a formula already used successfully by other authors (Keenan et al., ; Morilla‐Herrera et al., ; Rojas‐Sánchez et al., ; Torres‐Pérez et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the objectives of the present study was to identify factors associated with ISHM in polymedicated patients. To identify patients with ineffective management of their medication regimens, we selected the NANDA‐I criteria that best defined the ISHM diagnosis and the NOC indicators that related most directly to the management of medication therapy, a formula already used successfully by other authors (Keenan et al., ; Morilla‐Herrera et al., ; Rojas‐Sánchez et al., ; Torres‐Pérez et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NOC was chosen for the system because, as a fundamental reference for measuring nursing outcomes, it has established high interrater reliability and validity for its outcomes and indicators. [72][73][74][75][76] However, in communication with clinical experts in the hospital, we identified that there was still doubt concerning the interrater reliability in evaluating patient outcomes. Therefore, rather than simply requiring nurses to use the NOC, guidelines were developed so that different nurses would rate the nursing outcomes in consistent ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of 5 reflects the score that a healthy person of the same age, sex, and cognitive ability would score on the specified outcome. The reliability and validity of NOC outcomes were established in previous studies (Keenan et al., in press; Keenan, Barkauskas, et al., 2003; Keenan, Stocker, et al., 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%