2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1061830916120032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the results of ultrasonic testing of additive manufactured parts with alternative methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A testing standard should be developed for this, but there is yet to be one available. Previous work has been done in developing part evaluation techniques, including ultrasonic testing [115] and various methods for tracking crack growth in the parts after processing [5,6].…”
Section: Final Parts Testing and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A testing standard should be developed for this, but there is yet to be one available. Previous work has been done in developing part evaluation techniques, including ultrasonic testing [115] and various methods for tracking crack growth in the parts after processing [5,6].…”
Section: Final Parts Testing and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e radar method is based on the frequency of a returned signal as an indication of range. e radar signal is slightly weak, the detection depth is limited, and it is difficult to quantitatively analyze the degree of damage [9]. e ultrasonic method is widely used, but ultrasonic transducers are required to ensure the accuracy of detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A testing standard should be developed for this, but there is yet to be one available. Previous work has been done in developing part evaluation techniques, including ultrasonic testing [118] and various methods for tracking crack growth in the parts after processing [5,6].…”
Section: Experiments Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%