Assessing the risk of corrosion in amine-based CO2 capture process

Krzemień, Alicja; Więckol‐Ryk, Angelika; Smoliński, Adam; Koteras, Aleksandra; Więcław‐Solny, L.

doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.05.020

Cited by 49 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The heat‐stable salts become a major concern as they are non‐regenerable during regeneration reactions thus they remain and accumulate in the absorbent solution. Corrosion resulting from acid gases in flue gas can be present in vital parts of the absorber and desorption column of an amine treatment plant .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Emori

Jiang

Duan

et al. 2016

Materials & Corrosion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel in CO2 capture process with methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) solution has been studied under an absorber temperature condition (50 °C). The corrosion behavior was evaluated using electrochemical methods, weight loss measurements, and surface analytical techniques. Sodium sulfate increased the system corrosiveness and the rate of corrosion increased with concentration while sodium sulfite reduced the corrosion rate and the inhibition performance improved with concentration. Weight loss measurements showed an increase in corrosion rate with time for sodium sulfate while the inhibition performance for sodium sulfite was considerably low for the tested concentration.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Emori

Jiang

Duan

et al. 2016

Materials & Corrosion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These irreversible reactions may cause many operational problems and also contribute to amine plant corrosion [24,25]. Identification of the possible problems during a hazard and operability study (HAZOP) in an amine-based post-combustion system [26,27] showed that amine degradation is the most frequent reason for equipment and pipe corrosion.…”

Section: Oxidative Degradation Of Mea Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Biomass Blend Co-Firing for Post Combustion CO2 Capture

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The correct conduction of the CO 2 capture process in coal-fired power plants with the use of monoethanolamine (MEA) requires constant process parameter monitoring and ensuring a specific flue gas chemical composition. One of the most common problems in these types of installations is the progressive corrosion and degradation of the valuable solvent. Despite the established reduction levels of oxygen and impurities entering into irreversible reactions with the absorber, the flue gas composition may change as a daily and annual function of time. The article presents a detailed analysis of the flue gas components that have the greatest influence on carbon dioxide capture installation technical safety, i.e., SO x , NO x , O 2 , and fly ash. The analysis was based on the results of experiments conducted at the Jaworzno III Tauron Wytwarzanie SA Polish coal power plant. The results show a significant influence of the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process on MEA oxidative degradation. The amount of oxygen in flue gas during biomass and coal blend co-firing was nearly twice as low compared to pure coal combustion. Differences were also observed in the amounts of gas impurities with relation to the time of year and time of day of power plant operation.

show abstract

“…This technology is well-known and advanced but requires high regeneration energy. The MEA-based CO 2 capture presents also many problems such as equipment corrosion and amine degradation [9]. Oxygen and impurities contained in flue gas: acid gases (SO x , NO x , H 2 S), heavy metals, dust particulates [10] as well as hydrocarbons [11] can react with the solvent and lead to many degradation products.…”

Section: Biomass Combustion With Co Capturementioning

confidence: 99%

Co-firing coal and biomass blends and their influence on the post-combustion CO₂capture installation

Więckol‐Ryk

Smoliński

2017

E3S Web Conf.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Co-firing of biomass with coal for energy production is a well-known technology and plays an important role in the electricity sector. The post-combustion capture integrated with biomass-fired power plants (Bio-CCS) seems to be a new alternative for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This study refers to the best known and advanced technology for post-combustion CO 2 capture (PCC) based on a chemical absorption in monoethanolamine (MEA). The co-firing of hard coal with four types of biomass was investigated using a laboratory fixed bed reactor system. The comparison of gaseous products emitted from the combustion of coal and different biomass blends were determined using gas chromatography. Research proved that co-firing of biomass in fossil fuel power plants is beneficial for PCC process. It may also reduce the corrosion of CO 2 capture installation. The oxygen concentration in the flue gases from hard coal combustion was comparable with the respective value for a fuel blend of biomass content of 20% w/w. It was also noted that an increase in biomass content in a sample from 20 to 40 % w/w increased the concentration of oxygen in the flue gas streams. However, this concentration should not have a significant impact on the rate of amine oxidative degradation.

show abstract

Assessing the risk of corrosion in amine-based CO2 capture process

Cited by 49 publications

References 18 publications

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Analysis of Biomass Blend Co-Firing for Post Combustion CO2 Capture

Co-firing coal and biomass blends and their influence on the post-combustion CO₂capture installation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Assessing the risk of corrosion in amine-based CO2 capture process

Cited by 49 publications

References 18 publications

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO2 capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO2 capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Analysis of Biomass Blend Co-Firing for Post Combustion CO2 Capture

Co-firing coal and biomass blends and their influence on the post-combustion CO2capture installation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine‐based CO₂ capture system: effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants

Co-firing coal and biomass blends and their influence on the post-combustion CO₂capture installation