2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the risk of dupilumab use for atopic dermatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12] In dupilumab clinical trials, rates of general infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and nasopharyngitis resulted similar to placebo, and, in particular, viral infections, were not reported as meaningful adverse event. 7,13 In terms of effectiveness, dupilumab therapy obtained a satisfactory control of the disease and consistently with the other systemic compounds, treatment interruption did not cause a rapid and relevant worsening of the disease, as highlighted by the decrease of both patient-assessed severity scores and EASI score in patients discontinuing therapy. This finding is in line with a recent study reporting maintenance of EASI-75 response in 30.4% of high-responding patients treated with dupilumab, after rerandomization to placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11][12] In dupilumab clinical trials, rates of general infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and nasopharyngitis resulted similar to placebo, and, in particular, viral infections, were not reported as meaningful adverse event. 7,13 In terms of effectiveness, dupilumab therapy obtained a satisfactory control of the disease and consistently with the other systemic compounds, treatment interruption did not cause a rapid and relevant worsening of the disease, as highlighted by the decrease of both patient-assessed severity scores and EASI score in patients discontinuing therapy. This finding is in line with a recent study reporting maintenance of EASI-75 response in 30.4% of high-responding patients treated with dupilumab, after rerandomization to placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The effect of immunomodulant/immunosuppressive compounds on the clinical course of COVID-19 is currently unclear and there is concern of an increased risk of infection in AD patients treated with systemic compounds, though the continuation of therapy during pandemic was recommended by national and international scientific societies. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Nevertheless, immunomodulant/immunosuppressive agents, such as methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, and cyclosporine were suggested to be tapered to the lowest effective dose, likely avoiding disease flare, and to consider drug discontinuation in patients when viral symptoms are present. 2,5 Similarly, caution was recommended in prescribing systemic corticosteroids given their broad immunosuppressive effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 Patients on treatment with biologics, in particular ruplizumab for severe atopic dermatitis, interleukin (IL)-17-, 12- and 23-inhibitors for moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, IL-6 inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis and related disorders, TNF-alfa inhibitors for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa / acne inverse should be continued during COVID-19 pandemic, because the relapse of disease after discontinuation of such drugs poses a higher risk to patients. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinical trial meta-analysis investigated infection rates with dupilumab in pivotal phase 3 trials for AD. 22 This study examined rates of overall infection, URTI, and nasopharyngitis. Across these three infection categories, the rate of infection was not increased in dupilumab-treated patients compared with placebo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across these three infection categories, the rate of infection was not increased in dupilumab-treated patients compared with placebo. 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%