Assessing the Role of Socio-Ecological Learning in Participatory Governance: Building Resilience in Six Brazilian River Basin Committees

Abstract

Brazil has embedded the socio-ecological learning process in the participatory management of river basin councils through its "sister laws" on water and the environment. GTHIDRO or, Grupo Transdisciplinar de Pesquisas em Governança da Água e do Território/Tecnologias Sociais para a Gestão da Água (TSGA), a transdisciplinary group of researchers at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, took these laws and developed new interpretations of socio-ecological learning. They incorporated an ethical component and a dynamic and complex program of participatory "cycles of learning" that brought committees and communities to a common understanding of socio-ecological processes, laws, and potential for collective action. Using resilience theory as a framework for understanding how to sustain and enhance adaptive capacity (Folke et al., 2002), this paper analyzes the processes of socio-ecological learning, including focus groups, physical dynamics that blend the conceptual with the physical, visioning, socio-ecological mapping, project planning and community celebrations through interviews, meeting notes, and written documents of the six case studies. The potential for socio-ecological learning as a tool for building the capacity of basin committees (Turvo, Ermo, Nova Veneza, Orleans e Braço do Norte in the southern part of the state, Urubici in the mountainous region, and Concordia in the middle eastern part) to plan and implement projects is substantiated as an important tool for building the resilience of the combined systems. The case studies indicate that their greatest achievement is the Strategic Planning Model for Sustainable Development, entitled PEDS, which diagrams how to improve the management core group's capacity to plan and implement projects of their own design, using strategies they have learned and networks they have established in their watershed and state. While the potential for conflict over water and energy between the various economic sectors is strong in Brazil and elsewhere, with the GTHIDRO model the potential for collaboration on resource issues becomes even stronger.Keywords: social learning; socio-ecological system; participatory governance. RESUMO O Brasil tem incorporado o processo de aprendizagem socioecológica na gestão participativa dos conselhos de bacias hidrográficas por meio de suas "leis-irmãs" sobre a água e o meio ambiente. GTHIDRO, ou Grupo Transdisciplinar de Pesquisas em Governança da Água e do Território/Tecnologias Sociais para a Gestão da Água (TSGA), um grupo transdisciplinar de pesquisadores da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, abordou essas leis e desenvolveu novas interpretações de aprendizagem socioecológica. Eles incorporaram um componente ético e um programa dinâmico e complexo dos "ciclos de aprendizagem" participativos que trouxeram as comissões e as comunidades a um entendimento comum sobre os processos socioecológicos, as leis e o potencial para a ação coletiva. Usando a teoria da resiliência como uma estrutura para a compreensão de como manter e m...

Crise hídrica em publicações científicas: olhares da bioética ambiental

“…Embora a percepção ética possa variar entre indivíduos, sociedades e países, a proteção da água demanda a compreensão dos aspectos ambientais, econômicos, sociais, geográficos, éticos e políticos (Datta, 2015;Browning-Aiken et al, 2014, Castro, 2007. Nesse sentido, quanto mais às decisões forem balizadas por valores morais frutos da reflexão coletiva, tais como honestidade, verdade e lealdade, menos esforços serão necessários com políticas públicas e com normatizações para evitar a exploração oportunista, e práticas corruptas que prejudicam o bem-estar dos cidadãos e da natureza.…”

Do career adaptability and employee–employer fit relate to career resilience? A collaborative effort to depart from the state of “silos” to “mutuality” in academia

“…For example, individuals serving in academia have felt the rise in workload and accountability (McKay and Monk, 2017). Educational institutes have been employing different strategies to support their members in achieving career success, for example, a good track record in academic research (Browning-Aiken et al , 2014), relation-building with the academic community (Cox, 2013) and individuals’ resilience (McDonald et al , 2012). Putting the matter into context, the economic survey of Pakistan for the year 2019–2020 reports positive facts and figures regarding the growth potential and expansion of the Pakistani educational institutes operating in the domain of higher education.…”