Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) following postintubation airway stenosis (PITS) is a rare phenomenon. The impact of airway malacia and collapse on the prognosis and the success rate of bronchoscopic interventional therapy in patients with PITS had been inadequately investigated. Objective The aim of this research was to assess the influence of airway malacia and collapse on the efficacy of bronchoscopic interventional therapy in patients with PITS. Design This retrospective analysis examined the medical documentation of individuals diagnosed with PITS who underwent bronchoscopic intervention at the tertiary interventional pulmonology center of Emergency General Hospital from 2014 to 2021. Main outcome measures Data pertaining to preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative stages were documented and subjected to analysis. Results The patients in malacia and collapse group (MC group) exhibited a higher frequency of perioperative complications, including intraoperative hypoxemia, need for reoperation within 24 h, and postoperative intensive care unit admission rate (P < 0.05, respectively). Meanwhile, patients in group MC demonstrated significantly worse postoperative scores (higher mMRC score and lower KPS score) compared to those in pure stenosis group (P < 0.05, respectively), along with higher degrees of stenosis after treatment and a lower success rate of bronchoscopic intervention therapy cured (P < 0.05, respectively). Pearson analysis results showed that these terms were all significantly correlated with the occurrence of airway malacia and collapse in the airway (P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion The presence of malacia or collapse in patients with PITS was associated with increased perioperative complications following bronchoscopic interventional therapy, and significantly reduced the long-term cure rate compared to patients with pure tracheal stenosis. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 06/12/2021. Registration number: ChiCTR2100053991.
Background Expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) following postintubation airway stenosis (PITS) is a rare phenomenon. The impact of airway malacia and collapse on the prognosis and the success rate of bronchoscopic interventional therapy in patients with PITS had been inadequately investigated. Objective The aim of this research was to assess the influence of airway malacia and collapse on the efficacy of bronchoscopic interventional therapy in patients with PITS. Design This retrospective analysis examined the medical documentation of individuals diagnosed with PITS who underwent bronchoscopic intervention at the tertiary interventional pulmonology center of Emergency General Hospital from 2014 to 2021. Main outcome measures Data pertaining to preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative stages were documented and subjected to analysis. Results The patients in malacia and collapse group (MC group) exhibited a higher frequency of perioperative complications, including intraoperative hypoxemia, need for reoperation within 24 h, and postoperative intensive care unit admission rate (P < 0.05, respectively). Meanwhile, patients in group MC demonstrated significantly worse postoperative scores (higher mMRC score and lower KPS score) compared to those in pure stenosis group (P < 0.05, respectively), along with higher degrees of stenosis after treatment and a lower success rate of bronchoscopic intervention therapy cured (P < 0.05, respectively). Pearson analysis results showed that these terms were all significantly correlated with the occurrence of airway malacia and collapse in the airway (P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion The presence of malacia or collapse in patients with PITS was associated with increased perioperative complications following bronchoscopic interventional therapy, and significantly reduced the long-term cure rate compared to patients with pure tracheal stenosis. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 06/12/2021. Registration number: ChiCTR2100053991.
No abstract
Objective: To investigate the safety of continuing aspirin use in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing thyroid surgery during the perioperative period. Methods: Forty-four patients with coronary heart disease who underwent thyroid surgery in our department from July 2019 to June 2023 were selected as the observation group, and the observation group continued to use aspirin during the perioperative period. Forty-four patients who underwent the same surgery during the same period without coronary heart disease and without anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy were selected as control group 1. Another 44 patients with coronary heart disease who underwent the same surgery from August 2015 to June 2019 and used low molecular weight heparin bridging during the perioperative period were selected as control group 2. Clinical data from the 3 groups of patients were collected for retrospective analysis. Results: The age and proportion of male patients in the observation group and control group 2 were higher than those in control group 1, and the total hospital stay in control group 2 was longer than in the observation group and control group 1, with statistically significant differences (all P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, duration of drainage tube retention, postoperative hospital stay, and perioperative hemoglobin, platelet, and international normalized ratio between the 3 groups of patients (all P > .05). All patients in the 3 groups successfully completed surgery without serious complications or death during the perioperative period. Conclusion: Continuing to use aspirin in patients with coronary heart disease who undergo thyroid surgery during the perioperative period can safely complete surgery without increasing the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.