2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Severity of Challenging Behaviour: Psychometric Properties of the Challenging Behaviour Interview

Abstract: Background The Challenging Behaviour Interview (CBI) was developed as an assessment of the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…test–retest reliability, inter‐rater agreement, concurrent validity and content validity were generally reported to be good. (Oliver et al. 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…test–retest reliability, inter‐rater agreement, concurrent validity and content validity were generally reported to be good. (Oliver et al. 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBI has been developed as an assessment of such challenging behaviours and its validity and reliability (test–retest/Pearson's r = 0.76) has been published (Oliver et al. 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1985) ranged from 6 months to 3 years 11 months (mean = 2 years 10 months). Severity of self‐injurious behaviour (according to the Challenging Behaviour Interview; Oliver et al. 2003) ranged from 14–27 (mean = 21.63).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐injurious behaviour was defined as: ‘Non‐accidental behaviours which produce temporary marks or reddening of the skin or cause bruising, bleeding or other temporary or permanent tissue damage (examples – self‐biting, head banging, head punching or slapping, removing hair, self‐scratching, body hitting, eye poking or pressing)’ (Oliver et al. 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%