2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the significance of wetland restoration scenarios on sediment mitigation plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum reduction observed in the watershed outlet was 0.16% and most of the wetlands (96%) had less than 0.04% impact on TP load at the outlet, which was expected due to small size of the wetlands (maximum 8 ha) compared to the total watershed area (16,120 km 2 or 1,612,000 ha). The difference between load reduction at the subwatershed level and the watershed level is also in agreement with previous studies on streamflow and sediment load reduction (Martinez-Martinez et al, 2014;Martinez-Martinez et al, 2015). Table 3 shows the average annual TP load reduction (kg) for the four wetland sizes.…”
Section: Individual Environmental and Economic Aspects Of Wetland Ressupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Maximum reduction observed in the watershed outlet was 0.16% and most of the wetlands (96%) had less than 0.04% impact on TP load at the outlet, which was expected due to small size of the wetlands (maximum 8 ha) compared to the total watershed area (16,120 km 2 or 1,612,000 ha). The difference between load reduction at the subwatershed level and the watershed level is also in agreement with previous studies on streamflow and sediment load reduction (Martinez-Martinez et al, 2014;Martinez-Martinez et al, 2015). Table 3 shows the average annual TP load reduction (kg) for the four wetland sizes.…”
Section: Individual Environmental and Economic Aspects Of Wetland Ressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These values were selected as median rates reported by Kaldec and Wallace (2008). The length to width ratio of 2:1 and wetland depth of 0.3 m were used as recommended by previous studies (Martinez-Martinez et al, 2015). SUSTAIN was run four times, one for each wetland size, for the 2,293 selected subwatersheds resulting in 2293×4 = 9172 total runs.…”
Section: Wetlands Implementation In Sustain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An application of the approach to a watershed with numerous potholes in North Dakota showed an improved model performance in simulating stream flows at the watershed outlet. Another approach in enhancing SWAT characterization of wetlands is to couple the SWAT model with a United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) field scale model called System for Urban Stormwater Treatment and Analysis Integration (SUSTAIN) that characterizes drained water from upland flow [9,10]. In addition to wetland modules developed in SWAT, improvements have also been made in the semi-distributed Soil and Water Integrated Model (SWIM) [11,12] and the distributed hydrological model HYDROTEL [13,14] through incorporating wetland flow, nutrient, and groundwater related dynamics to characterize wetland processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%