2011
DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-679-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the sources of uncertainty associated with the calculation of rainfall kinetic energy and erosivity – application to the Upper Llobregat Basin, NE Spain

Abstract: Abstract. The diverse sources of uncertainty associated with the calculation of rainfall kinetic energy and rainfall erosivity, calculated from precipitation data, were investigated at a range of temporal and spatial scales in a mountainous river basin (504 km 2 ) in the south-eastern Pyrenees. The sources of uncertainty analysed included both methodological and local sources of uncertainty and were (i) tipping-bucket rainfall gauge instrumental errors, (ii) the efficiency of the customary equation used to der… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to quantify the uncertainty and generate the uncertainty map as well as the R factor map. Five key sources of uncertainty in a rainfall erosivity map were evaluated including: (i) rainfall measurement limitations (instrumental errors), (ii) the efficiency of the KE‐ I equation used to compute rainfall kinetic energy from intensity, (iii) the effectiveness of the regressions used to compute rainfall erosivity from daily or coarser temporal resolution rainfall inputs, (iv) the interannual variability of annual rainfall erosivity values, and (v) the spatial variability of rainfall erosivity values (Catari et al, 2011; Hanel et al, 2016). The estimation of the spatial variability of rainfall erosivity values is mainly related to station density or the resolution of gridded data and the interpolation method used, including the effectiveness of the covariates (Table 4).…”
Section: Mapping Outside the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to quantify the uncertainty and generate the uncertainty map as well as the R factor map. Five key sources of uncertainty in a rainfall erosivity map were evaluated including: (i) rainfall measurement limitations (instrumental errors), (ii) the efficiency of the KE‐ I equation used to compute rainfall kinetic energy from intensity, (iii) the effectiveness of the regressions used to compute rainfall erosivity from daily or coarser temporal resolution rainfall inputs, (iv) the interannual variability of annual rainfall erosivity values, and (v) the spatial variability of rainfall erosivity values (Catari et al, 2011; Hanel et al, 2016). The estimation of the spatial variability of rainfall erosivity values is mainly related to station density or the resolution of gridded data and the interpolation method used, including the effectiveness of the covariates (Table 4).…”
Section: Mapping Outside the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the fact that SOL AWC represented soil moisture characteristics or plant available water. This parameter plays an important role in evaporation, which is associated with runoff (Burba and Verma, 2005). It has also been suggested that the soil water capacity has an inverse relationship with various water balance components (Kannan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used this criterion because 3 mm or less of precipitation does not promote significant changes in the soil water budget (PÉRON; CASTRO NETO, 1986). To evaluate whether a given rainfall event can be considered as erosive, two criteria were considered: kinetic energy of rainfall greater than 3.6 MJ ha -1 or a rainfall depth greater than 12.5 mm over 10 minutes (CATARI et al, 2011).…”
Section: Relationships Between Sst Indices and Rainfall Erosive Variamentioning
confidence: 99%