2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the spatial fidelity of sedimentary charcoal size fractions as fire history proxies with a high-resolution sediment record and historical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core was split and imaged at LacCore with a Geotek Multi-Sensor Core Logger. Following Vachula et al (2018), minima of red and green color intensities from the Geotek high resolution images (1 pixel≈50 μm) were counted manually to delineate annual laminations (Trauth 2007, Roach 2010. Additionally, dated macrovisual stratigraphic markers (a charcoal lamination, a slump sequence, and two tephras) confirmed the varve-based age-depth chronology (table S1 is available online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/14/104011/ mmedia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The core was split and imaged at LacCore with a Geotek Multi-Sensor Core Logger. Following Vachula et al (2018), minima of red and green color intensities from the Geotek high resolution images (1 pixel≈50 μm) were counted manually to delineate annual laminations (Trauth 2007, Roach 2010. Additionally, dated macrovisual stratigraphic markers (a charcoal lamination, a slump sequence, and two tephras) confirmed the varve-based age-depth chronology (table S1 is available online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/14/104011/ mmedia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this letter, we consider the CHARs of two size fractions (63-150 and >250 μm, herein referred to as CHAR 63-150 , and CHAR 250, respectively) to match and benefit from the source area determinations made by Vachula et al (2018). Vachula et al (2018) previously compared CHARs of different size fractions in Swamp Lake with historical fire data and identified the source area of CHAR 250 and CHAR 63-150 to be 25 and 150 km, respectively (Vachula et al 2018), thus providing a record of local (>250 μm, within 25 km of Swamp Lake) and regional (63-150 μm, within 150 km) area burned.…”
Section: Charcoal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One commonly used fire proxy is charcoal, which is a carbonaceous material produced by heating of biomass during incomplete combustion (Whitlock & Larsen, ) and is usually divided into two size classes: macroscopic charcoal (particles ≥ 100 μm) and microscopic charcoal (particles ≤ 100 μm). The smaller particles are assumed to be transported over longer distances compared to the larger particles, and therefore, macroscopic charcoal is usually used to reconstruct local‐scale fires, while microscopic charcoal provides information on more regional‐scale fires (Marlon et al, ; Vachula et al, ). However, application of the charcoal proxy can sometimes be challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has the potential to isolate records of local fire histories in lacustrine settings because it includes macroscopic charcoal, as opposed to more traditional measurements of microcharcoal counts from pollen slides. Microcharcoal is more easily transported by wind and water, and therefore it is considered more reflective of regional fire histories than local fire histories, which are captured in macrocharcoal (Carcaillet, Bouvier, Fréchette, Larouche, & Richard, 2001;Vachula, Russell, Huang, & Richter, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%