2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11653-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the State-of-Practice of Model-Based Engineering in the Embedded Systems Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additional challenge here compared to the above-discussed challenge of round-trip engineering is that these on-site technicians or skilled workers are typically not trained to use model-driven engineering approaches and the acceptance of modeling languages is low. Furthermore, the additional licenses of the modeling software required for on-site changes might be prohibitive for supplier staff and even more applicable for customer staff Finally, three recent surveys of practice in model-driven approaches for embedded systems and usability of model-driven engineering notations in embedded systems and, specifically, aPS (Hutchinson et al, 2011;Liebel et al, 2014;Vogel-Heuser, 2014e) show that tool integration and tool usability as well as high effort to reap benefits are big challenges in employing model-driven engineering in industry. Education is an issue related to this.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The additional challenge here compared to the above-discussed challenge of round-trip engineering is that these on-site technicians or skilled workers are typically not trained to use model-driven engineering approaches and the acceptance of modeling languages is low. Furthermore, the additional licenses of the modeling software required for on-site changes might be prohibitive for supplier staff and even more applicable for customer staff Finally, three recent surveys of practice in model-driven approaches for embedded systems and usability of model-driven engineering notations in embedded systems and, specifically, aPS (Hutchinson et al, 2011;Liebel et al, 2014;Vogel-Heuser, 2014e) show that tool integration and tool usability as well as high effort to reap benefits are big challenges in employing model-driven engineering in industry. Education is an issue related to this.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While model-driven engineering shows an increase in effectiveness and quality and is used in the embedded software industry (Liebel et al, 2014) by exploiting domain knowledge, it also introduces general challenges and challenges specific to aPS.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SysML standard [19] defines a notation, not the way of using it. SysML therefore needs to be associated with a methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 (adopted from [4]) depicts these concepts. Although there have been a few prior surveys related to modeling in the embedded software industry (e.g., [5][6][7]), they have either focused on only one aspect of modeling, (e.g., the use of Unified Modeling Language (UML)) or the use of formal models, or modeling in regional contexts (e.g., in Brazil or in Greece). There are also surveys, whose participants were involved with model-based techniques on a single sub-domain of embedded systems (i.e., the automotive industry [5]).…”
Section: A Terminology: Mbe Versus Mde and Mddmentioning
confidence: 99%