“…, the E parameters of the thiophene series 1a–d cover a domain of electrophilic reactivity of 4 orders magnitude from the weakest electrophile 1d ( E = −21.33) to the strongest ones 1a ( E = −17.18). Figure also reveals that the thiophenes 1a–d used in this study display an electrophilicity that compares well with that of 4‐(2,2‐bis‐(phenylsulphonyl)vinyl)‐ N , N ‐dimethylaniline 9 ( E = −16.53) , the substituted pyridinium salt 10 ( E = −17.90) , the 3‐methoxybenzaldehyde 11 ( E = −19.32) , and the diethyl 4‐methyl‐benzylidenemalonate 12 ( E = −21.11) , respectively, but lower than that of 1,3,5‐trinitrobenzene 8 ( E = −13.19) , the conventional aromatic electrophile in S N Ar processes and the 3,5‐difluoro‐substituted benzhydrylium ion 5 ( E = 8.02), the most electrophilic species known to date . Within the E scale developed by Mayr and co‐workers, the electrophilicity of the most reactive thiophene, i.e., 1a ( E = −17.18) appears to be higher than that of some benzylidenemalonate such as the substituted diethyl benzylidenemalonate 4 ( E = −23.80), but have an E value lower by 11 units than that of 7‐chloro‐4,6‐dinitrobenzofuroxan 6 and 7‐chloro‐4,6‐dinitrobenzofurazan 7 ( E = −6.11) .…”