“…The main effect of group was also significant ( F =5.3, p = .01 ç =0.27). The individual group (1.89 m/s) was significantly faster than the control group (1.45 m/s; t =3.94, p = .003, d = 1.31), and faster than the social group (1.58 m/s; t =2.05, p = .08, d = .89), though the latter did not reach statistical significance.
Study quality
Low
CONSORT score: 12
Percentage of fulfilled criteria: 48.0%Smith et al 2014 [29], Lubans et al 2016 [30] Australia |
Study design
2-group cluster RCT
Duration
Intervention exposure: 20 weeks (Dec 2012 - June 2013) Measurement points: baseline, 8 months (post-intervention), 18 months Attrition rate: 19%
Sample
Children
N = 361 12.7 years/12–14 years 100% (M) Random |
Behaviour change theory
Self-determination theory, social cognitive theory
App features
Newly designed app: Goal setting for physical activity and screen time, self-monitoring (uploading pedometer measured steps), tailored motivational and informational messages via ‘push prompts’, assessment of resistance training skill competency, recording fitness challenge results, resistance training and aerobic exercises.
Intervention group
Goal setting, self-monitoring (steps through pedometer), fitness challenge during school sport sessions, teacher professional development, provision of fitness equipment to schools, face-to-face physical activity sessions led by teachers, lunchtime student mentoring sessions, researcher-led educational sessions for children, a smartphone application and website, parental education and tips for reducing screen time through newsletter
Control group
Usual practice (regular school sports and PE lessons)
Multi-component versus stand-alone app intervention
Multi-component |
Outcome
Physical activity (moderate-to-vigorous, total; minutes/day) Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption (glasses/day)
Other relevant outcomes
Fitness Weight status (BMI, waist circumference, body fat)
Measures
Accelerometer (worn on 7 consecutive days including weekend) |
Diet
Significant between-group decrease in mean glasses/day of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in IG (−0.6 ± 0.26; p = 0.01) at 8-months follow-up. No significant intervention effects at 18-months follow-up.
Physical activity
No significant changes in daily MVPA or overall PA at 8-months and 18-months follow-ups.
Sedentary behaviour
Significant between-group difference in mean minutes/day screen-time in favour of IG at 8-months follow-up (−30.0 ± 10.08; p = 0.03) and 18-months follow-up (−32.2; 95% CI: −53.6- -10.8; p = 0.03).
Fitness
Significant between-group increase in muscular endurance in IG as measured by mean push-ups repetitions (0.9 ± 0.49; p =0.04) and resistance training skills (mean units 5.7 ± 0.67; p <0.001) at 8–months follow-up. |
…”