1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.1994.tb00325.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Time‐Squeeze Hypothesis: Hours Worked in the United States, 1969–89

Abstract: This study assesses the hypothesis that hours of work have risen in the United States in recent decades. Using the Current Population Surveys and the University of Michigan Time‐Use Studies, we estimate changes in market and nonmarket hours worked between 1969 and 1989, finding evidence of a “time‐squeeze.” This trend is particularly pronounced among labor force participants who are neither under‐ nor unemployed. For this group, total annual hours of work have risen by 149.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the U.S. labor force is the most productive in the world because of long hours worked (Leete & Schor, 2008), other labor forces are far more efficient (as assessed by the input to output ratio). According to the UN International Labor Organization's Key Indicators of the Labor Market 2001-2002, U.S. workers put in an average of 40 hours more per year than their counterparts did in 1990 (International Labor Organization, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the U.S. labor force is the most productive in the world because of long hours worked (Leete & Schor, 2008), other labor forces are far more efficient (as assessed by the input to output ratio). According to the UN International Labor Organization's Key Indicators of the Labor Market 2001-2002, U.S. workers put in an average of 40 hours more per year than their counterparts did in 1990 (International Labor Organization, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also claim that conventional Current Population Survey estimates underestimated the 1965-1981 decline in work hours (compared to time-use estimates). This conclusion was, however, questioned by Leete and Schor(1994) who suggested that the Michigan Study, only measuring weekly hours, did not adequately reflect the substantial rise in weeks worked per year found in the CPS. 3 Leete and Schor(1994) found support for the "time-squeeze" hypothesis.…”
Section: Measures Of Market Timementioning
confidence: 89%
“…This conclusion was, however, questioned by Leete and Schor(1994) who suggested that the Michigan Study, only measuring weekly hours, did not adequately reflect the substantial rise in weeks worked per year found in the CPS. 3 Leete and Schor(1994) found support for the "time-squeeze" hypothesis. According to their results Americans worked longer hours and enjoyed less leisure at the end of the period.…”
Section: Measures Of Market Timementioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, most studies confirm the hypothesis that the average length of weekly and yearly working hours in the United States has increased or stagnated since the 1970s (Clarkberg and Moen 2001;Coleman and Pencavel 1993a,b;Hochschild 1997;Leete and Schor 1994), whereas the average length of weekly and yearly working hours in Western European countries has declined or stagnated (Alesina et al 2005;Ausubel and Grübler 1995;Golden and Figart 2005). Jacobs and Gerson (2004) have revealed a new macro-trend of bifurcation of working time in the United States: their empirical analysis shows that very long and very short work weeks have increased in the United States since the 1990s.…”
Section: Patterns Of Extreme Working Hours In Advanced Capitalist Socmentioning
confidence: 90%