2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac64a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite’s Yield of Rocky Planets Around Nearby M Dwarfs

Abstract: Terrestrial planets are easier to detect around M dwarfs than other types of stars, making them promising for next-generation atmospheric characterization studies. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission has greatly increased the number of known M-dwarf planets that we can use to perform population studies, allowing us to explore how the rocky planet occurrence rate varies with host radius, following in the footsteps of past work with Kepler data. In this paper, we use simulations to assess TE… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the early-to-mid M dwarf sample of Dressing & Charbonneau (2015), we instead find that the cumulative occurrence rate of all planets within our mid-to-late M dwarf sample is consistent with their work within the same period range (0.5-7 days), and lower by a factor of two when considering an equivalent range of insolations (>4 S ⊕ ), as demonstrated in Tables 7 and 8. This is consistent with the findings of Brady & Bean (2022) concluding that the planet occurrence rate likely does not increase and may decrease for the latest M dwarfs. It is also consistent with the recent RV study from Sabotta et al (2021) that did not find evidence in favor of planets orbiting stars with masses below 0.34M being more common than planets orbiting stars with masses above 0.34M , for orbital periods between 1-100 days, although the survey had a low detection sensitivity to most planets below several Earth masses.…”
Section: Notable Trendssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When compared to the early-to-mid M dwarf sample of Dressing & Charbonneau (2015), we instead find that the cumulative occurrence rate of all planets within our mid-to-late M dwarf sample is consistent with their work within the same period range (0.5-7 days), and lower by a factor of two when considering an equivalent range of insolations (>4 S ⊕ ), as demonstrated in Tables 7 and 8. This is consistent with the findings of Brady & Bean (2022) concluding that the planet occurrence rate likely does not increase and may decrease for the latest M dwarfs. It is also consistent with the recent RV study from Sabotta et al (2021) that did not find evidence in favor of planets orbiting stars with masses below 0.34M being more common than planets orbiting stars with masses above 0.34M , for orbital periods between 1-100 days, although the survey had a low detection sensitivity to most planets below several Earth masses.…”
Section: Notable Trendssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Their results are supported by occurrence rates measured with RV detections from the CARMENES survey, which found a significant increase in the occurrence rate of low-mass (1 M ⊕ < M i sin p < 10 M ⊕ ) planets with periods less than 10 days around stars with M å < 0.34 M e compared to higher-mass stars (Sabotta et al 2021). However, recent results from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS; Ricker et al 2015) suggest that the mission's yield of 0.5-2.0 R ⊕ planet candidates around nearby mid-M dwarfs is best produced by a constant or decreasing planet occurrence rate compared to early-M dwarfs (Brady & Bean 2022;Ment & Charbonneau 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses of large samples of surveyed stars show that planets are ubiquitous, with occurrence rates greater than 0.5 planets per FGK-type star for orbital periods between one day and a few hundred days, based on estimates using radial velocity (RV) data (Howard et al 2010;Mayor et al 2011) and transits (Fressin et al 2013;Petigura et al 2013;Kunimoto & Matthews 2020). Occurrence rates for planets with low-mass M-dwarf hosts are even higher, with values exceeding one planet per star (Cassan et al 2012;Bonfils et al 2013;Dressing & Charbonneau 2015;Gaidos et al 2016;Sabotta et al 2021;Mulders et al 2021) and possibly further increasing from early-to-mid M-type dwarfs (Hardegree-Ullman et al 2019, but see Brady & Bean 2022 for the opposite).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%