Assessing the usefulness of policy brief and policy dialogue as knowledge translation tools towards contextualizing the accountability framework for routine immunization at a subnational level in Nigeria

Abstract

Background Evidence suggests that implementing an accountability mechanism such as the accountability framework for routine immunization in Nigeria (AFRIN) will improve routine immunization (RI) performance. The fact that the AFRIN, which was developed in 2012, still had not been operationalized at the subnational level (Ebonyi State) by 2018 may in part account for the poor RI coverage (33%) in 2017. Knowledge translation (KT) is defined as the methods for closing the gaps from knowledge to practice. Policy briefs (useful in communicating research findings to policy-makers) and policy dialogues (that enable stakeholders to understand research evidence and create context-resonant implementation plans) are two KT tools. This study evaluated their usefulness in enabling policy-makers to contextualize AFRIN in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Methods The study design was cross-sectional descriptive with mixed-methods data collection. A policy brief developed from AFRIN guided deliberations in a 1-day multi-stakeholder policy dialogue by 30 policy actors. The usefulness of the KT tools in contextualizing policy recommendations in the AFRIN was assessed using validated questionnaires developed at McMaster University, Canada. Results At the end of the policy dialogue, the policy options in the policy brief were accepted but their implementation strategies were altered to suit the local context. The respondents’ mean ratings (MNR) of the overall usefulness of the policy brief and the policy dialogue in contextualizing the implementation strategies were 6.39 and 6.67, respectively, on a seven-point Likert scale (very useful). The MNR of the different dimensions of the policy brief and policy dialogue ranged from 6.17 to 6.60 and from 6.10 to 6.83, respectively (i.e. moderately helpful to very helpful). Conclusion The participants perceived the KT tools (policy brief and policy dialogue) as being very useful in contextualizing policy recommendations in a national policy document into state context-resonant implementable recommendations. We recommend the use of these KT tools in operationalizing AFRIN at the subnational level in Nigeria.

Evidence synthesis to policy: development and implementation of an impact-oriented approach from the Eastern Mediterranean Region

“…Finally, for two of the case studies, we could not evaluate the policy briefs and the deliberative dialogues; however, we believe the findings are representative of policymakers’ perceptions in Lebanon, especially since they also align with findings from the literature across settings and topics [ 52 , 59 , 60 ].…”

Policy dialogue: Key factors for the success of transit-oriented development infrastructure 3.0 in big cities in Indonesia

“…They expected that the results of the deliberation would create a compliance of opinion between the objectives of the infrastructure development approach and considerations of the broader community, the way the community viewed infrastructure problems and its relationship with the community, and the ability to utilize information and other innovative ideas to be accepted by the community. In line with the arguments of Williams and Lewis (2021) and Ogbonnaya et al (2021), policy dialogs were considered a tool to encourage evidence-based policy-making. Evidence of dialog was recorded and written as a report, proof of meeting participants' attendance, and the meeting results were jointly signed.…”